[v6ops] Re: [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-iids-problem-statement-01.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 19 September 2024 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670A7C151080 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_7mrbg7aaBw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A48C14F617 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 09:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1726763811; x=1758299811; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xFhtQzw9mbeMptqTK5KQ7amkqA3BJsbjs/y+n5TkIqc=; b=V7wElYWhpDTVx7mZgeTiNljb088szDe/4GwCmVYfCBy/h/3tSDBnWIAT pv+Uy0RHVduWWs/74WDCoMrJDIh+WFcrzCpnhjqA04xVNROIETES4c6b4 TBGNZm54lA1EHohiHrB7KHM3B1ER2geP2hroM0po7TlE+fBb9V/7JHyZX ioPtn2BMIqNJu4mf1rHaiYCJLo50enjC4Zs/2UNtD3b2emk9jQCuhaLrp AXttVGiuGfB7uf7+7jpw5W01VKoboJjGgXnRyp7anu8+tNLEjcMsYMd2h 1l1Vqs800iH5qCfAp54ZczDKXOis27P5Ri5EgwXOADzaciAxLNJwVNP6F w==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ldsSzBVIRBmlKwHOtozUTw==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: Y7yf70SeRgCUFay5rpzQdw==
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2024 18:36:49 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DCB18056C1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:36:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2E1180DF89; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:36:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 52E1013565; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:36:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:36:49 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Message-ID: <ZuxTISfMFvELJFwZ@Space.Net>
References: <CAKD1Yr3qdqMNPJa7bietzat5HFM4g=OLHeJQgvc+tktd4+rW8w@mail.gmail.com> <A83B7972-6937-42FF-947F-47A9C0E8DBA5@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2ySu5mAFg26ZJR5sPFnYrgB3wCkYaA72RzMFNKKQr5fpg@mail.gmail.com> <ZuxEdwwAw4EkvDH7@Space.Net> <f74270ff-ba7b-40d7-8fc3-45a24613c8be@nsrc.org> <BL1PR18MB4277A9F29C8D3A98D324E5D0AC632@BL1PR18MB4277.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <ZuxOwr-PEqF-wLbc@Space.Net> <BL1PR18MB427773F64F722CD554AB369AAC632@BL1PR18MB4277.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <ZuxQVTn30V0rw7md@Space.Net> <CACMsEX-GYUSmEUWwrk=+HVtum8NTg6YvYJo4-EL6Sg-O2ahAvw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pM1FTYeGYJcqdxi7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACMsEX-GYUSmEUWwrk=+HVtum8NTg6YvYJo4-EL6Sg-O2ahAvw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID-Hash: JHVTIPYFL36OCFYWQV4KMVXXHOYTEC7G
X-Message-ID-Hash: JHVTIPYFL36OCFYWQV4KMVXXHOYTEC7G
X-MailFrom: gert@space.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-iids-problem-statement-01.txt
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1YZjguJqI4v6TwB6fTI8X3NZP_s>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:33:21AM -0500, Nick Buraglio wrote:
> Current IPv6 GUA (2000::/3) Utilization: 0.08%, per
> https://stats.ipv6enabled.net/
> That's .08% of the allocated space which is, what, 25% of the actual total?

That's missing the point I brought up about "nontrivial networks, nontrivial
amounts of hosts all asking for their own /64 (or even multiple), and
all this being squeezed in a /48, because that's what IETF designated
an end site should have"

Looking at the grand total (with only FP 001 being allocated from) is
hiding actual operational numbers - what sizes do ISPs get, what sizes
do end sites get, what sizes do subnets (and hosts!) geht, and where
is avoidable pressure created.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
                                           Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279