Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 12 June 2017 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1336cd027b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4B4129C5E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 01:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3ejclJIvmY5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 01:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38653129C56 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 01:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1497257055; x=1497861855; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=ln+GFy1+zkVMxiY+xoYR63gQ4 +UtPhJPtl5HLryvAFE=; b=srT18RGzF99g5mjm2ISFd9Zy+jG8NQSay3UClZcOR 0UuDqBAfslMyYXBj+9hyQPHI24sBDYPcX4aOTG8sxj5hz1qOHgfUdLqkfeyqEvE7 Tr9MguBjqUhiOLNi90oQU7bf90CfalfyJAbIdP8FpeO20ax1ACD6nO1b24b0sZ/N ck=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=Kb1HapYWc5pz9bQQer6gH+S80wnQeoHOlhvE9FsTU+yPRnzEYHD0i1XDbgow R4ra+LFSnidwcldFEQ+JZ53IuZdO4/aRNZXxfydlCr3i62Llj29UWItJn zAJBIWt2cg9OqHGRt35l3dqvgs2oe/z7hsn4+VRuVzwE0jPf6QzzU0=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:44:15 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:44:14 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005449339.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:44:13 +0200
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:170612:md50005449339::VIvH5aOH2XzdUoCq:00006pzx
X-Return-Path: prvs=1336cd027b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:44:08 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <871023AF-5D40-43AF-A56E-78B0B7F428E2@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
References: <149606921435.3762.14727398533646344700@ietfa.amsl.com> <EE944897-3F1B-4E3D-8536-A303C741E102@consulintel.es> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E76580@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CB75E476-3391-4B66-9660-38B4B07C1617@consulintel.es> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009FE10B6@OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009FE10B6@OPEXCNORMAD.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3As1ZcNKT-aKrjqHwEWbPgyFK9U>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:44:20 -0000

Actually, thanks to you for all your inputs!

I just uploaded a new version, just considering the clarifications suggested by Brian regarding support of “internal/downstream” routers.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis/?include_text=1

I didn't change the “title” as I think still makes sense if we decide to keep going this path …

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Responder a: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Fecha: lunes, 12 de junio de 2017, 10:23
Para: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Asunto: RE: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt

    Hi Jordi, 
    
    Thank you for taking care of the comments. 
    
    Cheers,
    Med
    
    > -----Message d'origine-----
    > De : v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de JORDI PALET
    > MARTINEZ
    > Envoyé : samedi 10 juin 2017 12:38
    > À : v6ops@ietf.org
    > Objet : Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
    > 
    > Hi Mohamed,
    > 
    > I just uploaded a new version which the following changes
    > 
    >    1.  LW4O6-5 removed, was a mistake due to copy-paste from DS-LITE.
    > 
    >    2.  Removed citation to individual I-Ds for DHCPv6 options.
    > 
    > Of course, you were right regarding LW406-5, good catch, it was the common
    > copy/paste issue …
    > 
    > I also removed the reference to the individual I-D.
    > 
    > Regarding obsoleting or updating, I think this requires some more
    > discussion, also considering the other comments received in the list.
    > Let’s approach that in the next weeks.
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-
    > bis/?include_text=1
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    > 
    > 
    > -----Mensaje original-----
    > De: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
    > Responder a: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
    > Fecha: miércoles, 31 de mayo de 2017, 10:10
    > Para: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>,
    > "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
    > Asunto: RE: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
    > 
    >     Hi Jordi,
    > 
    >     Thank you for updating the draft. Below the comments that I do think
    > are still open:
    > 
    >     * Remove citations to individual I-Ds from the draft.
    >     * I'm not sure to understand the motivation for LW4O6-5. Please note
    > that this is not equivalent to DSLITE-4 for the simple reason that in DS-
    > Lite there are no IPv4 address assigned to the CPE from the network, while
    > there is one for lw4o6. I suggest to delete LW4O6-5.
    >     * Unless I'm mistaken, I don't remember there was a conclusion about
    > obsoleting RFC7084 or not.
    > 
    >     Cheers,
    >     Med
    > 
    >     > -----Message d'origine-----
    >     > De : v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de JORDI PALET
    >     > MARTINEZ
    >     > Envoyé : lundi 29 mai 2017 16:54
    >     > À : v6ops@ietf.org
    >     > Objet : Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
    >     >
    >     > Hi all,
    >     >
    >     > This is an updated version of this document, including the following
    >     > changes:
    >     >
    >     > 11.  ANNEX D: Changes from RFC7084-bis-01
    >     >
    >     >    Section to be removed for WGLC.  Significant updates are:
    >     >
    >     >    1.  G-5 added in order to comply with [RFC7608].
    >     >
    >     >    2.  LW4O6-5 removed.
    >     >
    >     >    3.  MAPE-3 removed.
    >     >
    >     >    4.  MAPT-3 removed.
    >     >
    >     >    5.  Included non-normative reference to [RFC7849] to clarify that
    > the
    >     >        details of the connectivity to 3GPP/LTE networks is out of
    > the
    >     > scope.
    >     >
    >     >    6.  Split of transition in two sub-sections for the sake of
    > clarity.
    >     >
    >     > 2, 3 and 4 above (added in the previous version) were referring to
    > the
    >     > explicit mention of NAT behavior. As each mechanism has the relevant
    > text
    >     > in its respective RFC, I leave that to those documents, to avoid any
    >     > misunderstanding or conflict.
    >     >
    >     > Regards,
    >     > Jordi
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > -----Mensaje original-----
    >     > De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de <internet-
    > drafts@ietf.org>
    >     > Responder a: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
    >     > Fecha: lunes, 29 de mayo de 2017, 11:46
    >     > Para: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
    >     > CC: <v6ops@ietf.org>
    >     > Asunto: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-
    > Drafts
    >     > directories.
    >     >     This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations of the IETF.
    >     >
    >     >             Title           : Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer
    > Edge
    >     > Routers
    >     >             Author          : Jordi Palet Martinez
    >     >     	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
    >     >     	Pages           : 30
    >     >     	Date            : 2017-05-29
    >     >
    >     >     Abstract:
    >     >        This document specifies requirements for an IPv6 Customer
    > Edge (CE)
    >     >        router.  Specifically, the current version of this document
    > focuses
    >     >        on the basic provisioning of an IPv6 CE router and the
    > provisioning
    >     >        of IPv6 hosts attached to it.  The document also covers
    > several
    >     >        transition technologies, as required in a world where IPv4
    >     > addresses
    >     >        are no longer available, so hosts in the customer LANs with
    > IPv4-
    >     > only
    >     >        or IPv6-only applications or devices, requiring to
    > communicate with
    >     >        IPv4-only services at the Internet, are able to do so.  The
    >     > document
    >     >        obsoletes RFC 7084.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    >     >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis/
    >     >
    >     >     There are also htmlized versions available at:
    >     >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02
    >     >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-
    > bis-02
    >     >
    >     >     A diff from the previous version is available at:
    >     >     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-
    > 02
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >     Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time
    > of
    >     > submission
    >     >     until the htmlized version and diff are available at
    > tools.ietf.org.
    >     >
    >     >     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    >     >     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    >     >
    >     >     _______________________________________________
    >     >     v6ops mailing list
    >     >     v6ops@ietf.org
    >     >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > **********************************************
    >     > IPv4 is over
    >     > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    >     > http://www.consulintel.es
    >     > The IPv6 Company
    >     >
    >     > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged
    > or
    >     > confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
    >     > individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
    > aware
    >     > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
    > this
    >     > information, including attached files, is prohibited.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > _______________________________________________
    >     > v6ops mailing list
    >     > v6ops@ietf.org
    >     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.consulintel.es
    > The IPv6 Company
    > 
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
    > confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
    > individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
    > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
    > information, including attached files, is prohibited.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > v6ops mailing list
    > v6ops@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.