Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FE3126BF6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jD_73Bf7_eG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta239.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FEF71200B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 01:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.9]) by opfedar21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5BFF3100638; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:10:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.42]) by opfedar07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3BFA6C0072; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:10:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::c845:f762:8997:ec86%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:10:11 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHS2ItrruE1LgJmVECmPD99k+NfaKIOElIA
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10:11 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E76580@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <149606921435.3762.14727398533646344700@ietfa.amsl.com> <EE944897-3F1B-4E3D-8536-A303C741E102@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <EE944897-3F1B-4E3D-8536-A303C741E102@consulintel.es>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8p6l7sTe7CFE6oAGiBN7dDHaCXM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10:16 -0000

Hi Jordi, 

Thank you for updating the draft. Below the comments that I do think are still open:

* Remove citations to individual I-Ds from the draft. 
* I'm not sure to understand the motivation for LW4O6-5. Please note that this is not equivalent to DSLITE-4 for the simple reason that in DS-Lite there are no IPv4 address assigned to the CPE from the network, while there is one for lw4o6. I suggest to delete LW4O6-5.    
* Unless I'm mistaken, I don't remember there was a conclusion about obsoleting RFC7084 or not.   

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de JORDI PALET
> MARTINEZ
> Envoyé : lundi 29 mai 2017 16:54
> À : v6ops@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is an updated version of this document, including the following
> changes:
> 
> 11.  ANNEX D: Changes from RFC7084-bis-01
> 
>    Section to be removed for WGLC.  Significant updates are:
> 
>    1.  G-5 added in order to comply with [RFC7608].
> 
>    2.  LW4O6-5 removed.
> 
>    3.  MAPE-3 removed.
> 
>    4.  MAPT-3 removed.
> 
>    5.  Included non-normative reference to [RFC7849] to clarify that the
>        details of the connectivity to 3GPP/LTE networks is out of the
> scope.
> 
>    6.  Split of transition in two sub-sections for the sake of clarity.
> 
> 2, 3 and 4 above (added in the previous version) were referring to the
> explicit mention of NAT behavior. As each mechanism has the relevant text
> in its respective RFC, I leave that to those documents, to avoid any
> misunderstanding or conflict.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Responder a: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Fecha: lunes, 29 de mayo de 2017, 11:46
> Para: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> CC: <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Asunto: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
> 
> 
>     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>     This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations of the IETF.
> 
>             Title           : Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge
> Routers
>             Author          : Jordi Palet Martinez
>     	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02.txt
>     	Pages           : 30
>     	Date            : 2017-05-29
> 
>     Abstract:
>        This document specifies requirements for an IPv6 Customer Edge (CE)
>        router.  Specifically, the current version of this document focuses
>        on the basic provisioning of an IPv6 CE router and the provisioning
>        of IPv6 hosts attached to it.  The document also covers several
>        transition technologies, as required in a world where IPv4
> addresses
>        are no longer available, so hosts in the customer LANs with IPv4-
> only
>        or IPv6-only applications or devices, requiring to communicate with
>        IPv4-only services at the Internet, are able to do so.  The
> document
>        obsoletes RFC 7084.
> 
> 
>     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis/
> 
>     There are also htmlized versions available at:
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02
> 
>     A diff from the previous version is available at:
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-02
> 
> 
>     Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
>     until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     v6ops mailing list
>     v6ops@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops