IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7086F1A00A8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ln4JDovmMYtP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E271A00A4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgkl9 with SMTP id l9so152855722wgk.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3Lc6mIjLZbj8jHqrVoBaLNqm/2E6LXvHLfYXUIF4jXU=; b=ffKtjV6q8TIyVP4cXaJP+1AhG4zH+JOK5TpSHFnXozjXSwE3Ovd27vF2mpxMm1RxWe avZszY800ylfMqg7/hhIvOee8cDbJ1OUvZ/raEw5v/Bvf6QjAKFxgKNqv0ascYdSRymD i4TFn31jGJnqVEuvc2dBP+2N/yD/t3IHk7YZ5Hd+Qkdh6qlPBZIORc8jjbdkl41d3WiF JeTpDle59RLNqflrBEl/35C8mS8Sx5elQS5ckvOACyGqwSawGS3JGwywlEvAKTmhYh2i H8C/TiUeLyWzCppWrjKa4qnltoyCZAp6IYjoqac4msIwwcD7Zp/cBnceXRGiSwlv6Y8d Vtnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=3Lc6mIjLZbj8jHqrVoBaLNqm/2E6LXvHLfYXUIF4jXU=; b=MAdRijJ6WtAZysRFXWwagrFGkmYAzihxeQUtzXnnLunMXI5z+3DA3UTc5hVb3m9Fq3 A+0PnQNdWkOfvy5xkBbWpyTH7CS7pGOiq70fd8Ew06YEF3ilQesRonfpdBCmAx3wNbBL +0exOsp2f2O3657AHAZ4uBsD0Je4NWl5RSxkJ77tH4PiBkLoekzWxt0Gn+oT60eb3ajj nsWhFLzfuhXaNukRhNlzC2xEFSn4h5iYaXn700tf+XwVzE9yC6AD7GrVDzPwXwx4+QF+ KfGomSx5Mnyb/UL1tRO/id8omLcaf8HKh6QUtNDF4aA3TdTH9STDoq6cU2rBR7vhXzS+ 7Zkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+Ho9HBQaZJ72AhvBb1LV1ZzzRz+GZjosXjTqD3vxz5y6P48NyhXYY4zyXLRaoYyln5vW8
X-Received: by 10.180.76.193 with SMTP id m1mr30322236wiw.11.1437476576209; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.138.203 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D1D2A832.1B7D8F%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <201507071147.t67Bl13m009348@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAO42Z2x7mNFbB_w_+W+80pY+LeCAKXaOBXMmQvkcaMSWhwW60g@mail.gmail.com> <EF21B630-5D0A-415A-A93F-9058900CC80C@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2zAqMXhBZ2wa=q0wtHGhMpMWU9TSjfFyd2quiki9w0oSw@mail.gmail.com> <85CADAA2-8DF2-4A6B-812B-7A77081936F5@cisco.com> <CAO42Z2w3fOxGJHasKqYZRfGZ2u=7FnZBm+jgLtgDvfZ7HYW=iw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z+DwOin23HQTysrZ9dNP924+LQ-vOExmJc_xZUEB4yCQ@mail.gmail.com> <228248C6-94FE-4C9C-A875-F732EFDC6601@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqapiWuy4Gk5t3zEe3XmaLyRc3nc5=aA1ED0tzfeXckbA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3Hn9qJTaM0v3+hr7NfQbLc=mOWYGwrTK-XXxKp5v+dpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxpdFsCy2Y7U0gFmQeHEvJjNj-243g_ffoJsVUeRz5RpZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1uR+HyBTB=Yhy5hGs1Z6Wv=HT3wwFgLYDosDJ7a78-PA@mail.gmail.com> <D1D2A832.1B7D8F%sgundave@cisco.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:02:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAedzxoX1dD3MQO5YCS6+u1esThW0sVv=JMmivJXZ92FKZ0sZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/59CPjVCNmWd97ogo7YEwAx9VG5o>
Cc: "draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org" <draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:03:01 -0000

On 20 July 2015 at 22:34, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:
> Did you guys look at RFC-6085 ? We published this clarification mainly to
> support per-MN prefix model on shared links, by the use of L2 unicast RA's.
> Is that not sufficient ?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6085 seems useful and it should be referenced.

But I would not say it's sufficient, if only from an "explicit
clarity" standpoint.  I think explicit mention of RAs and the other
discussion is helpful for implementors not inclined to dig to great
depths or just seeking explicit confirmation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email