IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP

Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sat, 04 March 2017 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D25F12949D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 22:50:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G59YNgg7yY3S for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 22:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1C312949E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 22:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u108so86214392wrb.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 22:50:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x9+wXS6Xj/pCLOH6J1rDxszZ6lOPBFiloeKS8VnjRCs=; b=Ch0xk4iq2jR2qLFz4hmAFF4+FneFvkmn06ueTpThokXqbxAlkZAlFf9J5Copz1d1v6 BYufs5peEGVlJ3joqsZVL/5zU69AvQ08GtYKOGZg4ZnzjJfnvCmB7BmMmX0II3Yn++sF Wmn9TX6r3neJZZz9PFScnB0qLcW92VEAR0dOOkO3FqnrfMh5QyTy6YSTHzXHfoj5xE5Y 6PJm9c08URS2/mHN7wYfPDAp+ah1bJtEbi5/jUL6igbJCGVffzhhO6V9I46uHTDDCyVr GQQoLS9EfVuXgil9tShS5VZG+pB1kdeSLOA1YK5iIQhxNGQdZxzwB0m50IGF4w1TWMmc e51g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x9+wXS6Xj/pCLOH6J1rDxszZ6lOPBFiloeKS8VnjRCs=; b=tfJgWT241NrAt/Dm40joV1Cgnr1y2tXljvV58uctH6GYTxqXLcWAKOKe/h7a3aXTWo 4Ps6xQeAzBowGwb9sQ972CXfq1b4oCNRww8lQ0J6EEelLJMZa+wKim3GbgKOe9gCmddV Dr6G0JLt7XcMF6Nk2Fn3zMYud464SsXbbt3TgnyH/c7R5do4tDO2mRe+moMmyg3Yp9+/ gKNKvKNX+QsaUUQ/OiPHsDVGUgZpo3ytLFAeD+6F51ppxRLCK2e49J3Lv6LNO6opISEG w4Qus0bnnVfl0maQ3f4qPtqpQ99vm9Jfn/kpH7ALlIwDMq2p2yrs1KjgO+uP55oQBK8T gGww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lfUcTGQXh3ogMaEhCS4yO0hzDE/D3Z+Wiz+js43p0FlBP2qcivIq0MLJRhf5hCLiRsrFc6bN0mI3MQJA==
X-Received: by 10.223.163.206 with SMTP id m14mr6428256wrb.34.1488610239219; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 22:50:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d1193890-0066-ad01-e521-0d9e8df065a8@gmail.com> <CAAedzxoy+=+FB=U89Fe84hDNwSdZTk0e8YYn934=V3RS3yb=DA@mail.gmail.com> <61403895-2de4-f769-2a8c-486d14a297f4@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTgCf1qWFxcG9psVFG_nfRj2EWUoy6i7mLY_39COESsYQ@mail.gmail.com> <66d7e60b-32ec-744f-384e-ef66cc01bf8b@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQC3rpoJU=fPgmxce-1LJHYoOdJW0FEKWa6PxyRrLyN+g@mail.gmail.com> <c538a328-46ca-d2f5-afcc-395af1fdcdee@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSUdmPSqM=VUkuA1dbfi1XA_mHpcY4v7RHhRiAgBo-hjA@mail.gmail.com> <bc036f63-9fa9-495a-f1c0-646e72cd6390@gmail.com> <CAAedzxoLTLLBt5=Ec6wV2VFcTuHRZ0Gn8C=3fL9h5uU_eN7roA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxoLTLLBt5=Ec6wV2VFcTuHRZ0Gn8C=3fL9h5uU_eN7roA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 06:50:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQH1Hsqd_wZwatztWPktvh9JM-UR=GAnWsRD97Qyf5_OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f2204848b9b0549e2145a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/6-E2NATlU5DeFmzLDVjpOL0JxzM>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 06:50:42 -0000

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:12 PM Erik Kline <ek@google.com> wrote:

> It is true that it cannot really be used to scale beyond the one hop
> that's doing the 64sharing.  Really the use is for when PD is not available
> (as Cameron noted).
>
> As the first paragraph of 7278 section 1 says, PD support is only even
> theoretically possible in release-10 networks.
>
> I am curious to know how many 3GPP networks (a) are release-10 or above
> and (b) support PD.
>

Any given 3GPP network is not one release or another. Most mobile operators
are effectively systems integrators that stitch together multiple
 technologies.  For example, t-mobile usa is deploying LAA this year.  Does
that make t-mobile a release 12 network?  Not strictly.



> Cameron: is there such info somewhere?
>

Not that i know of.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email