IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Sat, 04 March 2017 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F9112941C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:12:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYmGwZeN86yd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22c.google.com (mail-yw0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79C112941A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s15so69161138ywg.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 18:12:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4gK6eAB45xe0ik81Ba79rFygZYVXIalRsGTG2J8w5Hk=; b=ZAVOAFnSIc+3MjVwo9eokI3rJiExZPLPGaFM76cvilNLVDpaKgHzz35rIpQVNfeVOi Xo54HMZR9h969P3PsGr0c5VVE8WIfEbkvSJlBao1UctrmF/1PqR6jvjGleDUp0RSW3j0 AYh4PWFfvkm/wfy6AaMyHN1nN41C6vBzKcM0yH0WAiWHZhUooYqydCmx9YZySM2nT7sX eEdWAjq3BO2jfFv+4NQTv81eSUt+2K2KfibxmvUEA1xllbWXZDXWB1ZS3vOYuDhmm7M4 uq5PGbblwOualgB0524y6byDuqCK4A//rtygA+hcCNAKp8Mb/Xa4TkfTWhEKAplUjYhN 93OQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4gK6eAB45xe0ik81Ba79rFygZYVXIalRsGTG2J8w5Hk=; b=p7k47r2BY2dS/UUMDkYE0rLYU6dirNb6cInYtlGw7vNam6igdj6nVR1SXEMdhCq5uc k01rJxrrq6URhHwu4yrYwzIgPfx7PkmckhQlXeqofxQzMuYslO9EwtQfpS8cfZDlotkX mcccT4IieqvJVl7YvVUYNqmbSE6kHUfFAb+mbymNj6EPiorYmAYr51o8LNwoyicPxL/S TpJ5prdFwVTX6z6mbshWd1pS9nPu1to7/OjKw56Hhdzs1a9oKBd8atdslh8iLb7gbTsU QFfgx9kmMr4hNj4H5JqXKbpCnoFkuXp4vkPVSVIH/nHo42IsCrZT+TPKjajnL5fH7QJE T/vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l6Xe2KdZWUgXvfCGwClUXlGbb6df9pHrNF6xQwHNwIsqfogNwwe83StqpgdrlIBIFdbwQJsmEGtNS8p7dn
X-Received: by 10.129.183.18 with SMTP id v18mr3705573ywh.217.1488593521289; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 18:12:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.207.4 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:11:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <bc036f63-9fa9-495a-f1c0-646e72cd6390@gmail.com>
References: <d1193890-0066-ad01-e521-0d9e8df065a8@gmail.com> <CAAedzxoy+=+FB=U89Fe84hDNwSdZTk0e8YYn934=V3RS3yb=DA@mail.gmail.com> <61403895-2de4-f769-2a8c-486d14a297f4@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTgCf1qWFxcG9psVFG_nfRj2EWUoy6i7mLY_39COESsYQ@mail.gmail.com> <66d7e60b-32ec-744f-384e-ef66cc01bf8b@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQC3rpoJU=fPgmxce-1LJHYoOdJW0FEKWa6PxyRrLyN+g@mail.gmail.com> <c538a328-46ca-d2f5-afcc-395af1fdcdee@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSUdmPSqM=VUkuA1dbfi1XA_mHpcY4v7RHhRiAgBo-hjA@mail.gmail.com> <bc036f63-9fa9-495a-f1c0-646e72cd6390@gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 11:11:40 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxoLTLLBt5=Ec6wV2VFcTuHRZ0Gn8C=3fL9h5uU_eN7roA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="94eb2c1bddf21abddb0549de3034"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/k5fXEFHY8786dlLtxkd_h9nH-uU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 02:12:04 -0000

It is true that it cannot really be used to scale beyond the one hop that's
doing the 64sharing.  Really the use is for when PD is not available (as
Cameron noted).

As the first paragraph of 7278 section 1 says, PD support is only even
theoretically possible in release-10 networks.

I am curious to know how many 3GPP networks (a) are release-10 or above and
(b) support PD.

Cameron: is there such info somewhere?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email