Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and GUA

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 12 July 2017 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F74A13173A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6oTidtqbK1w for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2644B131738 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i2so17464652qta.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=aG87hk5oWcHSm8CnFefsbn8FpNkJaCPxjme2R3RvjE4=; b=cLD+MYRFESSxMuD0g6Mu6JwY/QjG0XLhofvNxblV4rUeLI5u1/aBB0g2OWnRgHzqHM JUzvSWSPYZd9kOHuImCUzJ7zjt9H6p+X8fmcwHb++3/97vK48TifONwC3iXDqN85DADt T3vv8rrlSDccgMjZE0YLfyPLXRLs3wpKuzZ4WaL0yTEts27cHK3Ukex+hMONR/Va/c4h E99hne28Rp6Avrmnt0EXlszvUdFugR5oePpQBCggEH8D/+Mha5/5pzmyvBck0Yo/xQu0 sYhGWpmwEKI8bUGatKnNCJ4tUrufjMHAibjbZOGOewZrWQL/lB1B5tdZodtIJxat65/H qGgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aG87hk5oWcHSm8CnFefsbn8FpNkJaCPxjme2R3RvjE4=; b=Dabli22ZKxmRVFkXEj1qfxJR0NC1mRVimxtEll7r3U7zqgE592A8GxgaFPKTzWHa0o 65RT3jah4+SjNpykQfvQUtQRKn7ihYhcHe3zGlSZnmvoJwZux7EmI4Or9Wu5HFYz9LsE ZakXk7M6Q33FbNz9Hs6dOHVnaY59tS12wMo0Uw+V/KZoLp/SuGgsU2Qppq2i4ZPtrEbP 2J/cKZT2i3sj+JnyMIuxArLp3mZWl0Xu+I4qKSxc3vCT9Lb4nSkHz+EacJiza4XkCjOK PWEkWmITF9Nvi2SGHoRIA9WtEewT+5LJDPmaB7gXF2IqR/a3Q9H+Q3xriP1z2dR1+G4Y dreQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112XkIYA5zPHQBlgjyF+N9VViuW9S2jqphLYGUNAU2T0Spinwxj1 qchIhA/K8FKPZRNlxx1MZWOgkg/cRw==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.100 with SMTP id s33mr8263093qta.48.1499878437189; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.60.44 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00d03635-4b5d-f4df-d3c2-1e7d69653bc9@gmail.com>
References: <937f22f6-e4b7-b398-9df9-79c36ea2d7ee@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002E21@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <a67eb7d0-be6a-f158-b05c-fda0f38e09d6@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002EF9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1be23f5b-f449-9924-8322-f21c4ccbd09e@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002F95@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2c325097-651e-501c-747a-e7a322c3d844@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0032B6@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6c43cf08-0bd6-daf4-ea9d-d52c34db2a8c@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqem6dKVcANbVgQLbny2ks5jvVNELRqwPECM_TiJtOtxcg@mail.gmail.com> <00d03635-4b5d-f4df-d3c2-1e7d69653bc9@gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:53:56 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QHCmshQhRqTflfhKVbxOzHilSUU
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqf7wSQ5ZLtPR-XTALStnFcu7wnHmfSXGQ1PL=q=vpYtpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/64XnVO5wY19hdaFxaNhOlw1xtYs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and GUA
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:53:59 -0000

At Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:15:52 +0200,
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> > If you really see an RA with a non-LL source address, a textual
> > snippet of the packet dump will certainly be interesting.
>
> A textual snippet may include addresses that are considered private.
> But I will send you privately the snippet.

You could mask the sensitive part of it, but, anyway, I actually see
RAs sent from a global address.  I don't know why it behaves that way,
but it's no secret that there are broken implementations so it's not
surprising.  Since the implementation is this broken I don't see any
point in discussing this particular case here - that is, no one here
will be able to answer why a broken implementation is broken or why an
operator uses that broken implementation.  You'll just need to talk to
that operator.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya