IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - TE/MS split mode?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A46131897 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 02:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiCDt_DDhe1d for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 02:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC31131895 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 02:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6D9hQJA012331; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:43:26 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A9AE203BF1; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:43:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A763203A78; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:43:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.227] ([132.166.84.227]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6D9hPrJ032154; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:43:25 +0200
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <937f22f6-e4b7-b398-9df9-79c36ea2d7ee@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002E21@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <a67eb7d0-be6a-f158-b05c-fda0f38e09d6@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002EF9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1be23f5b-f449-9924-8322-f21c4ccbd09e@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002F95@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2c325097-651e-501c-747a-e7a322c3d844@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0032B6@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6c43cf08-0bd6-daf4-ea9d-d52c34db2a8c@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqem6dKVcANbVgQLbny2ks5jvVNELRqwPECM_TiJtOtxcg@mail.gmail.com> <00d03635-4b5d-f4df-d3c2-1e7d69653bc9@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf7wSQ5ZLtPR-XTALStnFcu7wnHmfSXGQ1PL=q=vpYtpg@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0044C9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7efc2597-ad20-d15b-ccc1-b7fd0d97b68b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:43:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0044C9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rPypL7Lo_I7uG23j-BvurhfOVhc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - TE/MS split mode?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:43:30 -0000

What is a TE/MS split mode?

Alex

Le 13/07/2017 à 07:17, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com a écrit :
> Dear Jinmei,
> 
> I fully agree that there is no point to discuss a broken implementation.
> 
> Alex seems to use a TE/MS split mode. So the addresses he is seeing are not coming from the network.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de ????
>> Envoyé : mercredi 12 juillet 2017 18:54
>> À : Alexandre Petrescu
>> Cc : v6ops@ietf.org
>> Objet : Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and
>> GUA
>>
>> At Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:15:52 +0200,
>> Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> If you really see an RA with a non-LL source address, a textual
>>>> snippet of the packet dump will certainly be interesting.
>>>
>>> A textual snippet may include addresses that are considered private.
>>> But I will send you privately the snippet.
>>
>> You could mask the sensitive part of it, but, anyway, I actually see
>> RAs sent from a global address.  I don't know why it behaves that way,
>> but it's no secret that there are broken implementations so it's not
>> surprising.  Since the implementation is this broken I don't see any
>> point in discussing this particular case here - that is, no one here
>> will be able to answer why a broken implementation is broken or why an
>> operator uses that broken implementation.  You'll just need to talk to
>> that operator.
>>
>> --
>> JINMEI, Tatuya
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email