Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and GUA
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 12 July 2017 13:19 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A274C13169D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IA1TdKb_dnld for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 06:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B55131699 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 06:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6CDJ9l1004026; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:19:09 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 58F63204ED3; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:19:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6F5201382; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:19:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6CDJ9bC022848; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:19:09 +0200
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <937f22f6-e4b7-b398-9df9-79c36ea2d7ee@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002E21@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <a67eb7d0-be6a-f158-b05c-fda0f38e09d6@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002EF9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <1be23f5b-f449-9924-8322-f21c4ccbd09e@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A002F95@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2c325097-651e-501c-747a-e7a322c3d844@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0032B6@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6c43cf08-0bd6-daf4-ea9d-d52c34db2a8c@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A003E4C@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <48239c3c-cf5f-a2be-a6e4-d09e5bd084f5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:19:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A003E4C@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uC5UiJcz7rc46LuBTycT3TVXrdw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and GUA
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:19:13 -0000
Le 12/07/2017 à 14:02, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com a écrit : > Alex, > > The key part is not to use (or not) a GUA, but ... > > The GGSN shall not generate any globally unique IPv6 addresses for > itself using the Prefix assigned to the MS in the Router > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Advertisement. If it is not the GGSN then who does it? The UE receives an RA with a GUA in its SRC; packet dump available upon request. Alex > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : mercredi 12 juillet 2017 13:42 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; v6ops@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the LL address and >> GUA >> >> Med, >> >> [...] >>>>>>> Further, a network does not need IP-related information to >>>>>>> identify an UE. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree, so why does it want to impose an IID to the UE? >>>>> >>>>> [Med] This is an optimization to avoid DAD. >>>> >>>> Ok about LL, but how about the GUA? >>> >>> [Med] No problem at that front either (reading from the 3GPP spec): >>> >>> == Since the GGSN guarantees that the Prefix is unique, the MS does >>> not need to perform any Duplicate Address Detection on addresses it >>> creates. == >> > >>> >>> If the network uses a GUA same as >>>> the UE then there should be DAD for that GUA. >>> >>> [Med] Idem as above, the spec is clear: >>> >>> == The GGSN shall not generate any globally unique IPv6 addresses for >>> itself using the Prefix assigned to the MS in the Router >>> Advertisement. == >> >> I think that spec is wrong (3GPP TS. 29.061?). >> >> Because, in practice some operator on some APN puts a GUA (not an LLA) >> on its router's interface towards the UE. It uses that GUA in the src >> of the RA sent to the UE. Packet dump available upon request. >> >> Alex >> >>> >>>> >>>> I dont think there is any spec that tells that the network MUST >>>> NOT assign a GUA on its interface towards the UE. >>> >>> [Med] See for example, 3GPP TS. 29.061 >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I still don't see any privacy concern in supplying an IID to >>>>>>> an UE to be used for forming its link-local address. >>>>>> >>>>>> Err... >>>>>> >>>>>> It's because the supplied IID is very much like an IEEE MAC >>>>>> 48bit address. >>>>> >>>>> [Med] This is a link-local address not a GUA. So, not sure to >>>>> understand >>>> your point. >>>> >>>> I can understand your point about GUA privacy vs LL privacy. >>> >>> [Med] OK. >>>
- [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in the L… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - TE/MS split … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - TE/MS split … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… holger.metschulat
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… holger.metschulat
- Re: [v6ops] RFC6459 "IPv6 in 3GPP" - the IID in t… Alexandre Petrescu