IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D14E1ACD17 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MmWXlMrJN7xJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151791ACD15 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkfp126 with SMTP id p126so53199703vkf.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uzcQrPUdgP1OFsht/7QOgrtUvIJKhTq2nDtBgDBqQ6o=; b=SNjxyi2Q+2fJSi+W83+Daft3yhC9VtK4cmdisQ2R4QRG6+OmVOfWZBTifJiZNBQbIu GPrr3dQE2k81AUDKcSv2JdUVEFt5IfWRndDhpxVfSrn6REGB0nRNbBa5hzLM9lHfQUUh btlMh+O/+qJ1Gyjb8E4Sa/EplO2i456o8gkxShenuPahJYWwW4MOGu9JwoVA85XVtHo7 85f7t+v90ct2tJdIjzIoWMEyDLNiP+jyDJxM4D/eux+NAXtEejSmpoRFWQdjsLhEhW2j aM0HOhrbvaSiQ6zd/3vyOvju8tFr1Y92wjzV+vgX+5m5dJNWcHxB9zhLBkE2IR+tqCZT 5zrg==
X-Received: by 10.31.171.142 with SMTP id u136mr9185094vke.132.1443758848234; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.77.16 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1dCvfUBWRau9OnqVfr+F=UnrO2UDdqwrZr7dtxGELjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <71893E8D-913C-4F12-B159-4E522861A0E4@cisco.com> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B891690C2BE@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <41497FF1-E7F3-4A4C-8434-D9BD54E152B6@cisco.com> <560DBA24.6050206@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1dCvfUBWRau9OnqVfr+F=UnrO2UDdqwrZr7dtxGELjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:06:58 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xCA27My1U7YcKJkMyx+EqhvM5HZ+c192MnBG1ynToXBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8-jrWtAZzp8wgVAH8UvzpYM29ps>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 04:07:30 -0000

On 2 October 2015 at 12:17, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>  Certainly, this work could be discussed including the fact whether the
>> >> consensus is to remain within the 64-bit boundary between the interface-id
>> >> vs. not for any IPv6 addressing.
>>
>> I would strongly suggest discussing draft-smith-enhance-vne-with-ipv6 at
>> the same time.
>
>
> I would really like to hear about this sort of thing. It's a good example of
> the kinds of things we'll be able to do with IPv6 when it's deployed widely
> enough for us to think in terms of what we can do with IPv6, instead of just
> mimicking whatever we do in IPv4.
>

Just did a bump of the draft, I forgot to delete a section a few rev's ago.

Here's the latest:

"Enhancing Virtual Network Encapsulation with IPv6"
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-enhance-vne-with-ipv6-07


> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email