IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E901AC39F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r84uay7o3FqY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710AF1B2B42 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 05:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=868; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443790704; x=1445000304; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=uc57PomfUIDi0p5z5s3X6qrpFO5SZCT9boHQNwONauA=; b=PdYoblDGRDrueIswLpbPXnCqbYMrOI1DKUxu9CRxAxHHnrW8lXbqXN4O sedXnjef9TrzaXZRR5tl27JB5UrAKUf9PZp2NlUbqqkrlbs0E8ohMVx4l bb+QUOOdCJ66Ibz+37LhEhq2i1h6KX9JkURJ46fXpQjq/g6dombxjVD5J w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AAAgAyfg5W/5ldJa1egyeBQga9eQENh3QCHIEeOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJAEBAQQjEUUQAgEIEQQBAQMCBh0DAgICMBQBCAgCBAENBQiIJrcIlEQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgSKKT4RcFhsHgmkvgRQBBJV8Aah5HwEBQoQCcYhygQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,623,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="32129575"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2015 12:58:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t92CwN6g011248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 12:58:23 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:58:22 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (173.36.12.87) by xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:58:22 -0500
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.153]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:58:22 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] State of play as of today
Thread-Index: AQHQ/H2wzjVknD/1UEWCD7Z5ENLVa55XOKcwgABY1QCAAAIzAIAAOESAgABejKA=
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:58:05 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B891690C5D2@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <71893E8D-913C-4F12-B159-4E522861A0E4@cisco.com> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B891690C2BE@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <41497FF1-E7F3-4A4C-8434-D9BD54E152B6@cisco.com> <560DBA24.6050206@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1dCvfUBWRau9OnqVfr+F=UnrO2UDdqwrZr7dtxGELjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1dCvfUBWRau9OnqVfr+F=UnrO2UDdqwrZr7dtxGELjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.249.112]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CUFrRqM2aqM0VZLcEJAr495aVAA>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:58:29 -0000

>From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lorenzo@google.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 10:18 PM
>To: Brian E Carpenter
>Cc: Fred Baker (fred); Hemant Singh (shemant); Tom Herbert; v6ops@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today

>I would really like to hear about this sort of thing. It's a good example of the kinds of things we'll be able to do with IPv6 when it's deployed widely enough for us to think in terms of what 
>we can do with IPv6, instead of just mimicking whatever we do in IPv4. 

Does IPv4 in the data center support container/task migration and if so, how is it done today? 

Hemant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email