Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 02:18 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAD61AC39E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQ1-LYiKvoQ3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3961B1AC399 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykft14 with SMTP id t14so98756861ykf.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VdPqNevAUF5TD5qSoY9x/Dkh3dxJ/GyoTEeDdBKcTvk=; b=nCaZATNFJbBcuDUDE+hX9TF5tZDp4n21du3A7v0v4hDO6wsvlGmZL93UifDEUTtLMW tT3O5BvdB+v6JQzyt0TnpR1jZjzRBMJUil59xeOp1/IG2eUutuY0JR4UDt7xzl7xjB1h tIDvvWBOyp2+PRE1ItMQ2AkHocz7iu0/fLwTcqHmI9FSj5sSn1CE57NrmBaFvHOZwWNW EP+6VY5/js8GrbeqDg3/I+VI+J5wcaVkCslX0OgeaQQXCFDGunFah8TvX2PLbyfO2+0w I7W8bPc/3nHecfLVs8Q/aorS5GR1NhlL1ggjtieZIYWvSgY/uPLpPn28gV8hxfjATCQG 75bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VdPqNevAUF5TD5qSoY9x/Dkh3dxJ/GyoTEeDdBKcTvk=; b=VI1rJk1iJqR4FufLa4EGxzk2/j81FaZTwD2I4bECIcFKf8/0UrSqCOD9KPPnegwNoc bFPbyMT2Mf958lZHOrv7qRzFv4lQEImv6XvbjQWJBEOL0NdZiwn/Ab6GpW4iPx4/1t5M PPsYccYvDRzh/P6cXJApAtMdCSdAmbw8qh9Cv+F7RlcEi75xB0VrAkXlVXFAWVYKDC99 ItGZZIO8by9H2m9lSfy2fP5zZ/d3DHzsFH7VgsctdrtbflfQS/8grXlozDiYyiz6txeg OtBAserkiQhSYiSwJibHNP7RpDnNM3ARPC+emb4PBUnnWq4pTJv29QGiVhBUmW7Q+2Ng /0gQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3qQ8GeGTEMcS3J8ScPkujdHhdMePCrfR/rGpA/JW48gQiS6bcXL1hKiSemjBQELgwJ/gV
X-Received: by 10.170.190.133 with SMTP id h127mr11178747yke.115.1443752299303; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.52.204 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <560DBA24.6050206@gmail.com>
References: <71893E8D-913C-4F12-B159-4E522861A0E4@cisco.com> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B891690C2BE@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <41497FF1-E7F3-4A4C-8434-D9BD54E152B6@cisco.com> <560DBA24.6050206@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:17:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1dCvfUBWRau9OnqVfr+F=UnrO2UDdqwrZr7dtxGELjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a1302f21e78052115c69e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NFGz2xWiJpSSWeRpzQ_-s4h-ATE>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 02:18:21 -0000
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Certainly, this work could be discussed including the fact whether the > consensus is to remain within the 64-bit boundary between the interface-id > vs. not for any IPv6 addressing. > > I would strongly suggest discussing draft-smith-enhance-vne-with-ipv6 at > the same time. > I would really like to hear about this sort of thing. It's a good example of the kinds of things we'll be able to do with IPv6 when it's deployed widely enough for us to think in terms of what we can do with IPv6, instead of just mimicking whatever we do in IPv4.
- [v6ops] State of play as of today Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] State of play as of today Fred Baker (fred)