IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9A0129A15 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhHM4LDpjAVP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x243.google.com (mail-io0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F39129A22 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 68so7110673ioh.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gHT59fALkzJ3Z6qxtJJEYzQx/OqHQzzPbJ3Grc6aDLs=; b=JZDWdk4IXk8vrFcIF2N6QEbqeES8L4xV1ZIiA6CuEWw+Fd5ATThDVGCKnhl6yg/HrC GiW4G0OBfIZjNm1FBHrJ7LqCSKQvwB42xYN9+3vEhoApHETTmD6j5n6G8Man2fLiKPGC slUdGLKxZMIHv5x8LfaqlLbpgxN9tUrMWiunQTlB73mgmMtcsqqk4930KGW9qHxpbqlK zY1DB9oHOce6LmvqSKbn90seszuiydhH0IwB2EuLpR6w+Yy19vYJ+PhUh/IIP6k8ba1B 0XnH3zF2IwYNQGq8HXNfd8Hocu44BtFAigQioWsiT2XH2syquNcXmYGyi1gpRg0UfaIz 9ooQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gHT59fALkzJ3Z6qxtJJEYzQx/OqHQzzPbJ3Grc6aDLs=; b=i+mMA2PABozI6Co1wnHWKmaucufn2XPCBGwUbTsy0RTk/2hzjOsbxLxbA9YNF4V5Ke xO0ZLolu1AuUIlj2eP4pZmboKmOcGp43OTlRKa7odi8DpUJDGaKdtlTVkIk41vPzGNfz XC2vEPHmx2O4gCdyxkK2hSaaDXL8saxk7jWHFsjrCZoYlkLWGEkjKZ8aH6Ou0JMf3/HJ tvYazi9uIth8oFbfxpQVM4yCVFOkSkSMv7nrMzWnPZxdP31NInLN2cwDfZHH74rFmfDJ iLtdFAN+EyJ06plPzJnUeWeB1mXowudogv7S/YlEIcFveXSHFfSLqPYZKzx+kCZZ3srw 0M1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0yII6U+VNWfGiTHXHcf4SXMdsgmTRIHg7H2TgJc+SKYnZ4SjqVNBlI//mloJGSmQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.203.7 with SMTP id b7mr5928190iog.115.1490996591675; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m77sm1949709ita.16.2017.03.31.14.43.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <8365a4e0-d317-ed3c-59b3-2e829ff210f3@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:43:21 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9RnEAK1ZmnkNnRi1Glzb070cuY8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 21:43:15 -0000

On 30/03/2017 09:40, Fred Baker wrote:
> I have attached a pdf of the proposed charter as it ended this afternoon. I invite public commentary (to v6ops@ietf.org), and if you support using it as it stands, please say so..

Looks good to me.
 
> One question I intended to ask and didn't get to was the appropriateness of an interim meeting, perhaps in mid-May. It would primarily address draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations and draft-petrescu-v6ops-ipv6-power-ipv4, and potentially draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices if it is updated. There is an argument for leaving these to IETF 99, and potentially booking a second slot for that discussion. Your opinions?

I find it hard to answer without seeing a list of open issues for each draft.

> We have two WGLCs in progress or about to be so. The WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which Ron opened on 14 March, will end on 9 April. We will then open a WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix, to end 23 April.
> 
> I believe that the discussion today supported adoption of the following as working group drafts:
> draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs (as draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs)
> draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis (as draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis)
> draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update (as draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update)

I'm OK with adopting all three. I think from the discussion that happy-eyeballs-update
should perhaps be named differently, with Intended status: Informational, since
putting it on the standards track would probably take some heavy lifting. As a
report on enhancements it could progress quickly.
 
Regards
   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email