IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Sat, 01 April 2017 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D675128616 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKOUtJixNFvG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6F6124217 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1491090071; bh=KVJNPc2W/8IAArm5KbyRXLGesxhf9vD1z6YlkwM82vw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Content-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VUOh2tHQn6pzAm/ZUlEQ+zWDnkTHTUa+k/dQm5MEqcECDoIcm67i05DJtgi651WN+W8Jq00F4DHIYTbF3qzaDnkV9kSR1T5f4+rN6HHIxgXdkmYIZ3GtmGCFGPMTGchKcGak0eOK37+cKmKwbG+XBSnPtW3rbqkOz4M1/qaMMcI=
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am5eur02lp0148.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.180.148]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-72-f7EOczc7M2Wzp2ekIznvzw-1; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 00:41:08 +0100
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.14) by AM3PR07MB1137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.163.188.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1019.8; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:41:06 +0000
Received: from AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29d9:4eb6:edcf:55dc]) by AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::29d9:4eb6:edcf:55dc%14]) with mapi id 15.01.1019.009; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:41:06 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98
Thread-Index: AQHSqMzOl2pKnVBvckyLliBC42JP2KGvfgiAgAGzOwA=
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 23:41:06 +0000
Message-ID: <F6384322-279F-4B23-8476-87C930B2ED35@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com> <8365a4e0-d317-ed3c-59b3-2e829ff210f3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8365a4e0-d317-ed3c-59b3-2e829ff210f3@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:a88:d510:1101:20f3:cb50:43dc:997a]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR07MB1137; 7:rre9mSRc9Nnndig/VwZtcQYCTj+mz3Gnz1iquRUSgMUPHf1e0t0S6TuDyb50JatnMKhqJhe9dqanpvsG0xgmvCIplAm7Q36qt2glU1IjYynkDQYtNnGRvCCX3IU7NFDUnBgKI75JwU+PUMMwZ3vduDLiEPN0hh03ZJrzEKNvA01VUIfy1zBvOvQioNAi+NRLRaP/6fFHb+krycPMaSMZ68pPtIkstG5x6LxM3fYvrM6MktZpoe72Dyu8Fei2dS4O+wTn1CeX0J6XInSaOWT3e5pLJ0thSRQfkOkEKOhox69tI2t+QUCzmzei/W/bvaO270h/dNrV+C9qOAFTMDlgSQ==; 20:MRGjL8U6OlsaZ14rmc0d72GavmdCBSMvMfQg1WOuvrjiJ6ECCeDpRzGybjA4rtCuCE6mfmvn+j9yAqMcgAMKDhLR2WDKhsjQfuVSDqyLS0l2nKrK6dV6KzR4XHcMxpEN+lajRE1VwhMuK3AiRcHflWUss861YUUHmS63LTKOKuw=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 476806d6-969e-4c53-10fe-08d4795890f4
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:AM3PR07MB1137;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM3PR07MB1137D752C7F3A1927AB89821D6360@AM3PR07MB1137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281529075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:AM3PR07MB1137; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR07MB1137;
x-forefront-prvs: 0264FEA5C3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(24454002)(4326008)(25786009)(53546009)(8676002)(53936002)(6512007)(83716003)(39060400002)(305945005)(99286003)(57306001)(6436002)(50226002)(6506006)(38730400002)(110136004)(6486002)(8936002)(81166006)(6246003)(6116002)(3660700001)(2906002)(102836003)(6916009)(2950100002)(42882006)(229853002)(74482002)(33656002)(189998001)(82746002)(5250100002)(2900100001)(7736002)(5660300001)(36756003)(76176999)(3280700002)(5890100001)(86362001)(50986999)(32563001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR07MB1137; H:AM3PR07MB1140.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <5E0121098D10FC428DB79ABA7B6E5F0B@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2017 23:41:06.0673 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR07MB1137
X-MC-Unique: f7EOczc7M2Wzp2ekIznvzw-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QjZu16RjdLOjbG4QGjtAkt3vnXY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 23:41:15 -0000

Hi,

> On 31 Mar 2017, at 22:43, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 30/03/2017 09:40, Fred Baker wrote:
>> I have attached a pdf of the proposed charter as it ended this afternoon. I invite public commentary (to v6ops@ietf.org), and if you support using it as it stands, please say so..
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
>> One question I intended to ask and didn't get to was the appropriateness of an interim meeting, perhaps in mid-May. It would primarily address draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations and draft-petrescu-v6ops-ipv6-power-ipv4, and potentially draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices if it is updated. There is an argument for leaving these to IETF 99, and potentially booking a second slot for that discussion. Your opinions?
> 
> I find it hard to answer without seeing a list of open issues for each draft.

Seconded. Is the intention a physical or virtual meeting, or both?

>> We have two WGLCs in progress or about to be so. The WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which Ron opened on 14 March, will end on 9 April. We will then open a WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix, to end 23 April.
>> 
>> I believe that the discussion today supported adoption of the following as working group drafts:
>> draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs (as draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs)
>> draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis (as draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis)
>> draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update (as draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update)
> 
> I'm OK with adopting all three. I think from the discussion that happy-eyeballs-update
> should perhaps be named differently, with Intended status: Informational, since
> putting it on the standards track would probably take some heavy lifting. As a
> report on enhancements it could progress quickly.

Agreed. 

I really like the updated happy eyeballs document. How about “Happy IPs Towards Enhanced Resilience” or HIPsTER?  

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email