IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EE6129408 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01, T_HK_SPAMMY_FILENAME=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LeoQLzjOvItB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11221201F2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b140so6878570iof.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:to:message-id; bh=GJQ9LCeMRo6D8vQGetIa5bHAkPWbAt/xWyjGTCJ4v3s=; b=igdlqAk69RjlF96nNV/WqG+qiIkQOncAdvg6I3R2jfIIqY9EabMSHYkC3++8wQlqR2 cFAww0thm1xV0yl91zCYb3O65nZlHh0MxLCYGSN543peSc4VxggXs+19RfzC0CtTPtE0 wKHQcZ+iwGC1165P7FXdJltWMetIqTOlNhv8gjb6ObyUyN3gyn+Uq4iGM7pijUmy9MJL o/PsZowku+G1mxaRxjdbONEcsWTmQixkmx2EwVoNdRPwe342mbIWHKEDqFf/Ph8fL9Kx H6CZrCF9+1JgHXEb0ElevASSn2hlhBlW8fjxjI8BDAIJJgCPmC4z05TrMXjc6yJ/ayDG kfzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:reply-to:mime-version:date:subject:to :message-id; bh=GJQ9LCeMRo6D8vQGetIa5bHAkPWbAt/xWyjGTCJ4v3s=; b=e0St/0tZIsFNTv9x00klI03O6sCI0+PRphkCdiM/9f/my9gVMyAm6Ljks1ph2gtIns 1B2dOj/nzj4r2upkSSE7SRLDFJ2gPKD5VZ0oMKz57M2ty527y25ag5VFHDW5/d2tFMMD 5os5/WIgdiHMscRbj7qkpy1uW4yu2K0N7U1b1Db5wO4JoPS2hmIJNGZhnj5zI9pICLCx 7P9HzWQZn8v/NChWRjtbSULm+2aihaZzhzSN7CNUhrLbJBqrvH+y48dkliw6Z0oHOBYd 5jQCK8qPzrVxLlzC+Gho01kVAamHhW8XGqzm6DhsqkhBM84mTh7U6frRk5XF8ILRunW+ bVZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1GDjstlWuOFJQYXKQuKfPuHsLD5QDDpR0MOt/eRXyACHplG/T1QtHKvzBJhkbtNA==
X-Received: by 10.107.185.135 with SMTP id j129mr2737464iof.3.1490820043086; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t2001067c037001281d70430dfe4751fd.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c037001281d70430dfe4751fd.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:1d70:430d:fe47:51fd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x193sm3882256ite.21.2017.03.29.13.40.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCF954B6-EA79-4663-8505-7D5B93FA779D"
Reply-To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:40:26 -0500
To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NLFa2Sf90stIiEEKP3lxAJRS30I>
Subject: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:40:46 -0000

I have attached a pdf of the proposed charter as it ended this afternoon. I invite public commentary (to v6ops@ietf.org), and if you support using it as it stands, please say so..

One question I intended to ask and didn't get to was the appropriateness of an interim meeting, perhaps in mid-May. It would primarily address draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations and draft-petrescu-v6ops-ipv6-power-ipv4, and potentially draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices if it is updated. There is an argument for leaving these to IETF 99, and potentially booking a second slot for that discussion. Your opinions?

We have two WGLCs in progress or about to be so. The WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which Ron opened on 14 March, will end on 9 April. We will then open a WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix, to end 23 April.

I believe that the discussion today supported adoption of the following as working group drafts:
draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs (as draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs)
draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis (as draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis)
draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update (as draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update)

None of these can be considered to be "done". I would encourage people with comments to make them to the list, carrying the draft name in the subject line, and including suggested text for anything specific.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email