IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 March 2017 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127D212945D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BkHgj0sK48NW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FF012947E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 190so64109515itm.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uHrmtuu4hEY0VC0RKLFBwJFHDiNQ9ucj0Cbz2KkwkWU=; b=J8AptRHzzi9LwwTNrBIxeA5/MwPeykCYHzyYG4RDGsqEb1y8CIWZD0uxq6rXxDRNwn aqTPimuLoCdVZHQ0OvJiglZC8vrodj42rB20Jpi8UH6D8sWckR9desvJdjuYeFIgQntd WKGJvTQI63nF3osMBNTtndrNyRpEOTEjv7tIaivuQ+m1R57wbfIWP750xgPpG1BICsEA 1PkU/7cCK8pOmd4wmrgY6J2fsTP0ezCxNu1KG9n9RzxD6OZqzySCRGjXi27f3HQkcYjo mUg8bOoTklUwGRU1aw5ig8xLQhaQnZxccozBRvppi9zE64qe+CDKX4d1jFnoEX7K1VNm FqOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uHrmtuu4hEY0VC0RKLFBwJFHDiNQ9ucj0Cbz2KkwkWU=; b=V0K9jRe8LKQE2qQoIHNVqFOHrlMW/Gt64X9CN6Cd0bojBISRO6AI9Icy8YAOBAwOXh DkLI9GMisQnNYgmJg3DrLAouGVfMpsVzaSQzi/3Yom+yx2q/KkymJMio7HGZ6GTFmHkZ QL9npPgLm7fmFRHQsuwi7/opKmfITu4ioKaxkPmStRW/d8Oq+iULCJFbGrF5ReY7dlp9 vnyGlKO6OXocI956rZNB9JnsU76kQni82mg21GTLSHpr5gsxprMyX0mb63iv9jK+oIwk URgeIuWAhqCSVi1iGtGQodUBG6N1C2aDh8Wsm7kJzsaFaayA0L9m/1y0NFf5r5npj2/D 8AVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0N8pP/7wXVGzutuoTQuiH956zT0qeXicoGYmvf4sYiFBoLT4izl61Bo5dZfxNhNg==
X-Received: by 10.36.200.8 with SMTP id w8mr460195itf.112.1490821106018; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t2001067c037001281d70430dfe4751fd.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c037001281d70430dfe4751fd.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:1d70:430d:fe47:51fd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g69sm240080itg.17.2017.03.29.13.58.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:58:09 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <95E46CE5-F904-483B-9952-BB38A76B7BCB@gmail.com>
References: <6C1E351B-F8B6-4BC2-890D-993A1F081226@gmail.com>
To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mBISVW0gcvkKMGmfardOvHB-THI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Outcomes from v6ops@IETF98
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:58:28 -0000

On Mar 29, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe that the discussion today supported adoption of the following as working group drafts:
> draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs (as draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs)
> draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis (as draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis)
> draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update (as draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-update)

What I didn't say and intended to - if you agree or disagree, please say so.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email