IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-network-happyeyeballs

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Mon, 26 November 2018 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50553126BED for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:41:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgYJNp3HWMGi for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:41:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6016130DE0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:41:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wAQEf0gI001451 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:41:01 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <BYAPR05MB42453683C869E9A5327DA903AED70@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <ab520597-6c6d-b250-6439-91bbe70cdb36@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:40:59 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/6.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB42453683C869E9A5327DA903AED70@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BXnq84pt56Ccd_GMHyfUDBGkQGM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-xie-v6ops-network-happyeyeballs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 14:41:05 -0000

Ron Bonica wrote on 26/11/2018 14:22:
> Each week between now and IETF 104, we will review and discuss one
> draft with an eye towards progressing it.
> 
> This week, please review and comment on draft-xie-v6ops-network-happyeyeballs.

what's outlined in the draft sounds interesting, and it would be useful 
to see code published which implements what's suggested.  But I don't 
see a compelling case to publish this as an RFC.  Sometimes running code 
is better.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email