Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 16 July 2018 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1735e3eca6=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEBF130E3C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtAF_JsoBgkb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC19127AC2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 06:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1531746952; x=1532351752; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type; bh=tY7QwqAf/mTpsupraqO1wwTDc1lA+vIiyh WO5C3n6Ls=; b=V/66Vx1JooS51ZLOPp/uRlnS0W89r7OFDMvw0PMbYMBFWuh3// f5ekj9x/x9KxAwwNEttm4R02n4HiR2BQExbvJn5U1X+9mJpoIfbLyuAmJldCgZYC TiSGO+lXBzTvEFduL61Cld8QFUFhbiM+YT30ZydlXX8BhgBvpdTpmkeIY=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:15:52 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:15:50 +0200
Received: from [31.133.141.254] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50005812787.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:15:48 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:67c:370:128:84c0:7437:deab:157f
X-MDHelo: [31.133.141.254]
X-MDArrival-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:15:48 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1735e3eca6=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.f.0.180709
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:15:41 -0400
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <0070516C-46DF-4E3D-87AF-880B32634D31@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments
References: <CAD6AjGQqaQumYyBPVG6qkc9cs+jSGFKgUnGHkMfJmtes5Fk47g@mail.gmail.com> <AD5D4A8E-8A02-463B-A222-3D32A6235DF4@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQsDq1ELdZPnaAtbZPq5SZoXbD--W5JS5tkN63J1D=W9g@mail.gmail.com> <2F5CCC76-4364-4B66-B956-199969CFFCB4@isc.org> <LO1P123MB009802AF44568758A8A3ECB4EA410@LO1P123MB0098.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3fa26b65c7c64eada0ae04caa0a94ddf@orange.com> <20180712130103.GQ11393@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF599FE@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2B33FCAF-C612-45FC-AA9F-7F087F164937@cisco.com> <BA45FF0F-D492-43BF-A56F-6155A7F6B962@gmail.com> <2018071609524852778154@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2018071609524852778154@chinatelecom.cn>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3614577343_2000134178"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/D-W2TapMyfJL6B0cdtRtBXheDSA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:16:06 -0000

I’m not sure this is a topic for this draft.

 

It can be argued that any transition mechanism is against “promoting” the IPv6 deployment. It is a balance between deploying IPv6 and making sure that the way we do it is not disruptive to create “too many” problems for customers.

 

Any transition mechanisms is imperfect, and this means that if that means that the same service being IPv6 native works better, sooner or later, it will be preferred.


Regards,

Jordi

 

 

 

De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de "xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>
Fecha: domingo, 15 de julio de 2018, 21:54
Para: "fredbaker.ietf" <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "nick.heatley@bt.com" <nick.heatley@bt.com>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>, KOSSUT Tomasz O-PL <tomasz.kossut@orange.com>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments

 

 

One of the debate about NAT64 is that it will slow down the transition process of IPv6, for it allow the existance of IPv4, especially in the content side, the OTT, especially smaller ones,  will have less incentive to move to IPv6. I do not mean that this point is right,  but this draft should give some explanation or clarification to this issue.

 

Thank you!

Chongfeng

 

xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn

 

From: Fred Baker

Date: 2018-07-13 02:24

To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)

CC: nick.heatley@bt.com; v6ops@ietf.org; KOSSUT Tomasz O-PL

Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments

 

 

> On Jul 12, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <rajiva=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> 

> A-AAAA address synthesis without DNS64 usage??

 

As described in RFC 7050/7051? Why not?

 

 

_______________________________________________

v6ops mailing list

v6ops@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

_______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.