IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 02 July 2018 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B716130ED8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2aIWzaBkOkH9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF7C130EC9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jul 2018 17:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w126-v6so6022929oie.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 17:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=CV5hJIRY+UTtvYMIaWKkOprfMdaNCMszsqIJnkJxaQM=; b=jWxRcxXHd2OurEoPv5JJG/2iGO7a1qcOeiLn2KzLpBkP7MifnZxMFJvxEuPMqlnLql uVnmuZhAAWT3MkEQPmA1kIc/0NbGQFCeuh4Amuib+mxlglGmxlEUr4ggBEwHqBcmfZPG Id09sNeohDOxqtrd4YhbCOcM88G1jUY78FwuJSyKN7V1zxrkfywiUDpb9BX9ymoGbPaM v+uQ/ISDLN0CC7FG8UI5tDtj5fK1hY4KRS4AcIdHdFFeduDmyHzL7GmHeKQNAHH1UHy+ l+Ha/4ecEHxPohkwQJZZTcUYvYsEixzXsnQ9rSa6jmh49jmw76ktTVsk4FfmHCC4PoJo mhqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=CV5hJIRY+UTtvYMIaWKkOprfMdaNCMszsqIJnkJxaQM=; b=ttr2U+jWvScqjV5wKfXT9QYSJES3FDfTInaWBI6Vvl8NNJB7K3M+faxLWqOKRq/xiI zpWGDcDWPCV98gCfxSjtU1esQ9nASVQD9Xf6LLBJkGMLWfm/S6b9i2PaA2sNkLDGPRCP 87WNOQ8jddQs4qxB92Av4cbA/SxBQEpefDdVtpPpWddzyxrme4euGNOfBPyAHxyj++sD maa98gadBMhEvetli3fZPcI2H/Nemrioez1AiSDHn2d0qyRf+eXcFf6CUnhX2sHI91QR NQngGalYASTz/28VNw2a0CBeKYVxJ9ZhFLeugjEbatsQcKTOD8SWyJc9BNju+/ep01Fi hELA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0HRs2bQmQJuMaRXHk6qHDyYKnYm8X9lSzwZ3n7nRZQvBL0sL/z 2BQ9xwlrFyupnoigpRDhsHXVAUb/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeB6JFl4Bk1uWlVP4QieAIQE+w9Gcv2Zi5Ujs8l5SOUQkp7qmIJLhvu+abZ7K06YWx/pWEMNA==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4d87:: with SMTP id a129-v6mr14577957oib.256.1530492129634; Sun, 01 Jul 2018 17:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1546::101b? ([2600:8802:5600:1546::101b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a8-v6sm6868082oiy.3.2018.07.01.17.42.08 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Jul 2018 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3C71E4DD-D3D9-488E-8F99-7B6B7EB12117"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2018 17:42:07 -0700
References: <663F489C-7F63-4B0C-A5E6-F7EE4634E62B@gmail.com> <60335039-287e-4fb3-870b-2c4fe9b5445d@otenet.gr>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org list" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <60335039-287e-4fb3-870b-2c4fe9b5445d@otenet.gr>
Message-Id: <2D196DD1-FF0F-4365-8F50-5AD98DCBA989@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FpXnR9JbZmEOm8cMcBhvvz-I0Bw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment-02 comments
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 00:42:13 -0000

OK, I see enough interest in taking this to the next step. I have instructed Jordi to refile draft-palet-v6ops-nat64-deployment as draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment.

> On Jul 1, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Yannis Nikolopoulos <yanodd@otenet.gr> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> as with all such documents, this has a potential to help those starting with such a transition. So, I support the draft's intention
> 
> regards,
> 
> Yannis
> 
> On 06/27/2018 08:04 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> Chair comment: I am interested in making this draft a working group draft. I think there is merit in it to do so. However, following our usual process, I need agreement from the working group. Consider this a solicitation for that. To do so, I'm looking for comments, supportive or otherwise, especially from operators. To respond to Barbara's question that she raised with ipv4aas, making it a working group document doesn't mean it's done, it means it's a work item as opposed to a suggestion to the working group.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email