Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66 WGLC

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 04 March 2011 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD153A6A3A for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:50:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.939
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.939 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9+J3vZenxgtn for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:50:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A913A6A2D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:50:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 23173jjaeggli.corp.zynga.com ([12.184.108.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24LpUlk027471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:51:31 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4D715EDD.40403@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:51:25 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <0E87AEAD-8476-499E-8946-C8E31D2E21E9@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E87AEAD-8476-499E-8946-C8E31D2E21E9@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:51:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:50:27 -0000

Just a reminder this working-group last call ends to the 10th.

joel

On 2/24/11 5:18 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
> draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66. Please read it now. If
> you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes,
> etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as
> disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need
> to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
> 
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
> comment to make. _______________________________________________ 
> v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>