Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66 WGLC
Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Sun, 27 March 2011 01:39 UTC
Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CD828C0E4 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsbGz+v2G+dK for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EE228C0E8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2126741iwn.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=4Zm0gQFh6pEogDDOLwz5Ro3CNC9PGl+Vd6GdHqEPZ18=; b=mBgK1sbKbOwe+z6Zyhwdgpow8cDl1sCnfS2KfFsLu/AUzlnq6x7j0Ii3hsSbd7VKHc 2Ln27GZo6w63yRco2ZRFzGKDiDcZIlX6Rbx6xLIl8icMSCP/jI91Bq6rHftQqvMKay0+ AJRX3jvfKlzEUFHflZx8gOeT/TFi1S3HSJv2U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=x6qQyrykx0jYpYlnLF33WEYbEZYJQ9OLlqJXfjC2XZ6MaTaaKFOEsJonPULITQFQPb HyWll5oDfxL6XWIIdtnzk3WR4AvirV/KWQdUGu5aQF75WuyBE8VaKlu+iODmX69mTgpF o4g9LmzcipNKfq9vGWt3e3Y35YjxNdloouXac=
Received: by 10.42.77.74 with SMTP id h10mr623271ick.317.1301190062784; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [58.98.37.41] ([58.98.37.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uf10sm1719442icb.17.2011.03.26.18.40.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Apple-Mail-50-760309541"
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B30CBC6C-1993-4E3F-80E5-09D82A8C7500@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:40:56 +0900
Message-Id: <3C953803-00BB-45C2-BAAD-854EFB160BC5@gmail.com>
References: <0E87AEAD-8476-499E-8946-C8E31D2E21E9@cisco.com> <4D715EDD.40403@bogus.com> <B30CBC6C-1993-4E3F-80E5-09D82A8C7500@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 WG Ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 01:39:31 -0000
All, The attached draft is our update version with the feedbacks. I had failed to submit update version of our draft when the draft title had to be changed from "nat66" to "ipv6nat" at final cut-off date. So we'll soon submit updated draft after the submission door open, and ask to chair to change the draft title. Best regards, --satoru
On 2011/03/10, at 19:04, Satoru Matsushima wrote: > Fred, Joel, Brian, Bob, Randy, Teemu, Tom and all, > > Thanks to all of you for your review and useful feedback during the last call. > We're working on the draft to update with the feedback so then we'll post a revised > version. > > > Best regards, > > -- > Satoru Matsushima > > > > > > On 2011/03/05, at 6:51, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > >> Just a reminder this working-group last call ends to the 10th. >> >> joel >> >> On 2/24/11 5:18 AM, Fred Baker wrote: >>> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of >>> draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66. Please read it now. If >>> you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, >>> etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as >>> disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need >>> to be addressed, please post your comments to the list. >>> >>> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the >>> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and >>> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important >>> comment to make. _______________________________________________ >>> v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat6… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- [v6ops] Er, we had this converstaion before [draf… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Fred Baker
- [v6ops] NAPT-based multihoming [draft-ietf-v6ops-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-… Satoru Matsushima