Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66 WGLC

Fred, Joel, Brian, Bob, Randy, Teemu, Tom and all,

Thanks to all of you for your review and useful feedback during the last call.
We're working on the draft to update with the feedback so then we'll post a revised
version.

Best regards,

--
Satoru Matsushima

On 2011/03/05, at 6:51, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

> Just a reminder this working-group last call ends to the 10th.
> 
> joel
> 
> On 2/24/11 5:18 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66. Please read it now. If
>> you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes,
>> etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as
>> disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need
>> to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
>> 
>> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
>> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
>> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
>> comment to make. _______________________________________________ 
>> v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops