Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption WGLC

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, 神明達哉 wrote:

> At Sun, 23 Aug 2015 11:00:01 -0700,
> fred@cisco.com wrote:
>
>> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption.
>> Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested
>> wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater
>> issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional
>> issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the
>> list.
>>
>> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
>> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
>> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
>> comment to make.
>
> I've read the draft.  It's well-written, and I think the topic and its
> content are useful.
>
> I have one minor comment on Section 2.2:
>
>   Some networks send periodic multicast Router Advertisements (e.g.,
>   once every few seconds).
>
> I guess the intent here is explain non-default cases where multicast
> RAs are sent out very frequently (correct?).  But the actual text
> doesn't necessarily read that way to me, since sending multicast RAs
> periodically is the default behavior per RFC4861, and the default
> interval is between 200sec and 600sec.  Assuming my interpretation of
> the intent is correct, I suggest revising this sentence as follows:
>
>   Some networks send periodic multicast Router Advertisements very
>   frequently (e.g., once every few seconds).

Thanks for the catch, I think this was exactly what we intended to say 
here, I've noted it down.

--a

>
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>