IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption WGLC

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 31 August 2015 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644E1B3823 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvvG3b23BmWx for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA001B36BC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykey204 with SMTP id y204so39221056yke.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=K+Cdc/XdHOJFvyK/+P44mNTXipvw0o9kA1Jp0nsA4Nk=; b=cxhx0arc/gEkuvRPvz+s3qNWhyTolwm7hehdKlrQ6LP77j2lBDT3RFiqJISVuL04uo cEwznGnj8GdhlIMETblsBzOPsaaYyCFhV1YYfnWErKCCudPV441HQsOPBVT2b0eHRLXP KtWJCGgCwZ+m1bjcs3f1MwpX+ZX32AOBus/eOdax0Qe7nmx5iXZxYdKJJXEbQdMBIMy3 PthmxCBXcNtEIKTAZtI1b+K47Gp3dMCEmwT3B5jmY6RNLAquC4lyhqrHFOnYvuNMeqpt RHLA1CJ9NC4gjmpfdJtxRSzgxsozEzBIqq5s9pV7rU3H9MRSK1X5XLiuvv/+tQD9RziQ aJpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=K+Cdc/XdHOJFvyK/+P44mNTXipvw0o9kA1Jp0nsA4Nk=; b=K+hZv3mLDw3SbyWL7MOePw8ULTL8jOEpwsILVo7CQxStKX0p4BFe8DHHMlnZFRIyAn /vPU+4a8xHfqTLhDWjnvVkP1E0KthNd/ZxEPJLAuSBLhIK4u/UxlRvvVH4S/GfFlsKGp PdkWNtuNJOPSm85CFL7O7Q3kGDYyaAVrOiHY/fxGtSfjsmcKlweyO0Iy66qxVPdK+uR3 xhx25vWPr74FI94FsJWsCxiPFwjua+ChD4NKrdZmvje97EqwMh4ZP3NfQhWfotHsy7gM 5fovyKgTn6jQuGQG+JRTKbYq6eGm7rHo+yB9Y82qjNaZxggsWlGfe1yxOEaCixF7r8jL hlxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm4apIDQjv3/Hn3WWlZabxukLSbMzAPC+0u+/5Y31S6R6rnFM8Dr2/Gn51Vl+cnI1nLjg4i
X-Received: by 10.13.198.71 with SMTP id i68mr18601590ywd.149.1441010775475; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.116.147 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPi140NBoatOEdhxtxm1PsWVb5gQSWqauC+Rx7aW6k+6=HdESg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201508231800.t7NI011E029031@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <55DF0CEB.5040500@globis.net> <55DF12E0.6040603@gmail.com> <CAPi140NBoatOEdhxtxm1PsWVb5gQSWqauC+Rx7aW6k+6=HdESg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:45:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Bc2-gKoZD0X7ucoc5oEa8ykTLoLgzTfhbHNM8L9KPZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e53da64308c051e97776d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WmaoyI5n5pAgVhRIzrCtHk1djMc>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:46:17 -0000

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>
wrote:

> >   The sentence: "This is frustrating for users of   these networks."
> > does not convince me. The impact of a bad battery life is quite big, to
> > say it's just "frustrating" IMHO is not enough. I think it should be
> > remove or create a stronger sentence.
>
> If Lorenzo agrees, I'd opt for removing the sentence about the
> frustrated users.
>

Personally, I'd be more in favour of replacing "frustrating" with
"infuriating", but I guess removing it is fine too :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email