RE: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Thu, 11 June 2009 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3DC3A6AF1 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.602, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSAkONIRUiTy for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382B43A6AE5 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MElOC-000LzZ-Kv for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:36:24 +0000
Received: from [130.76.32.69] (helo=blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>) id 1MElNq-000Lr7-8j for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:36:07 +0000
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (slb-av-01.boeing.com [129.172.13.4]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/8.14.0/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id n5BEZqRg004785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n5BEZqPa007554; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.55.84]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n5BEZn1l007472; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.54.35]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:46 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:35:44 -0700
Message-ID: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1060B4733@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <849BBBF9-2DC5-4322-AD9C-AD1F9DB5BD86@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn
Thread-Index: Acnqicu+ZZ7EhzdrSRmbtCDacSZ1VAAF1Ipw
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F0719F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <000001c9d502$9843c980$5b0c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F0726E@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F075C2@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4A127FA0.6050603@free.fr> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F43989@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20090519192430.GK2776@Space.Net> <474EEBD229DF754FB83D256004D021080BC9A0D9@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20090520062916.GN2776@Space.Net> <4A13B880.3050407@mesh.ad.jp> <f9e2d08a377.377f9e2d08a@huawei.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905201623420.18643@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <4A30B0A2.8010207@gmail.com> <849BBBF9-2DC5-4322-AD9C-AD1F9DB5BD86@cisco.com>
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Behave Chairs <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2009 14:35:46.0816 (UTC) FILETIME=[E880D000:01C9EAA1]
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

Fred,
 
> Well, yes. My understanding is that the topic of CGNs is moving to
> behave, and so should be submitted to behave. You can verify with the
> behave chairs.

The subject matter of this document seems more concerned
with what IPv6 operational functions could be placed on a
platform that might also support a CGN function, rather
than the behavioral aspects of CGN itself. If the bulk
of the material is about IPv6 transitions, wouldn't that
qualify the document to remain targeted to this group?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com