IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu> Thu, 04 June 2009 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96253A690C for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkTak7YuAe2A for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143E13A6AF1 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1MCETI-000IO1-6K for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:03:12 +0000
Received: from [2001:738:0:411::241] (helo=mail.ki.iif.hu) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mohacsi@niif.hu>) id 1MCET3-000IN6-7b for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:03:03 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1600284FC2; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:02:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mignon.ki.iif.hu
Received: from mail.ki.iif.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mignon.ki.iif.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Y0iP2ZUvT12y; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 9002) id DD68584E2B; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA63B84BF9; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:02:50 +0200
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
X-X-Sender: mohacsi@mignon.ki.iif.hu
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
cc: JiangSheng 66104 <shengjiang@huawei.com>, Seiichi Kawamura <kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Re'mi Despre's <remi.despres@free.fr>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, guoseu@huawei.com, "Russert, Steven W" <steven.w.russert@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn
In-Reply-To: <4A2773E5.5010702@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906041701550.60110@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F0719F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <000001c9d502$9843c980$5b0c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F0726E@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F075C2@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4A127FA0.6050603@free.fr> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A105F43989@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20090519192430.GK2776@Space.Net> <474EEBD229DF754FB83D256004D021080BC9A0D9@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> <20090520062916.GN2776@Space.Net> <4A13B880.3050407@mesh.ad.jp> <f9e2d08a377.377f9e2d08a@huawei.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905201623420.18643@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <4A2773E5.5010702@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Janos,
>
> (Delayed reply, sorry)
>
>
> On 2009-05-20 15:25, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>>
>>
>> Janos Mohacsi
>> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
>> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
>> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
>>
>> On Wed, 20 May 2009, JiangSheng 66104 wrote:
>>
>>>> A document such as this is very helpful and I thank the authors.
>>>> One concern I have about this kind of model is the widespread
>>>> ICMP filtering in IPv4 networks. I see many ISPs that filter ICMPv6
>>>> just as they do with IPv4 and has been causing problmes. This
>>>> is especially important in a tunnel based solution such as this.
>>>
>>> Hi, Seiichi, thanks for your reply. I understand your concern. Yes,
>>> ICMP fliter is a problem. We will take this in count later.
>>
>> They should have a look at this draft:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4890
>>
>
> Do you think the draft needs to do any more than recommending to follow
> the recommendations in 4890? It seems as if that should be sufficient.

This should be enough.
 	Best Regards,
 			Janos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email