IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Mon, 19 August 2013 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264AC11E81A7; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJDSVHA9qm+l; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC8E11E80D1; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AWD36529; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:43:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:42:42 +0100
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:43:26 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.66]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:43:19 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHOnDzVcyHroPwXkkimHplb/XQgn5mb4oOA
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:43:18 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923ACF4BEA@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.145]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:43:33 -0000

Reading this document made me believe that fragment should NOT be deprecated and the support for fragment would be better in long-term. I personally agree on such observations and conclusions. I support the publication of this document. Thanks authors for gather these value information.

Sheng

>-----Original Message-----
>From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Fred Baker
>Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:00 AM
>To: v6ops@ietf.org
>Subject: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC
>
>This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop.  Please read it now.
>If you find nits
>(spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the
>authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a
>statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed,
>please post your comments to the list.
>
>We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
>document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
>believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
>comment to make.
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email