IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC

Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com> Mon, 19 August 2013 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jfesler@gigo.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D523121F9C4E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQb0ZyNw6rjR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7445A21F9C38 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q55so3295973wes.16 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9nVmj4id3YFO+rCZ8JIDIj9fZxOzGhIZgHX2jNJ1qH0=; b=WKBTvFhPFe0fN85uNbV8K5M/CbnNzlbLnlBCNQaU9PIAkZjRY1eoINxDb51rl9GBkq d6irgWLIn6IcaQWP79F/49CreaQvQBUPduai/8XC3y99AZBkMVSwCo3lob+KUQaX+C/t 2KgxYWBQkZ9906/b59rpnz47nXzt6dLGOZ3CTHYG5Y22n3bT+TMyVTfe1WW+sS1xYASh rMm4iio+41CrZuZwM098S718jcRooFNiPTyaJnFnjYRe9PFKlzY5wv9aLa0QLP+DHZDo fvUoh2idCdFTURcFe2DKTJ19uDvzV/wOtnCCqXDkLLTyP0Qtqef6UhP1vpeMOdyYkenQ 88Hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzUt9kD099VMGFLJnWJbssCpadIJIpr3PuuayZVA61tRqBEVeWBhJOPIIu+7bDdFX1TT6s
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.163 with SMTP id lh3mr6399631wic.27.1376881902558; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.248.131 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
References: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:11:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CADCiYHBs2g+-KV7t6vt9bFR+DmqM_RacJBnDbYZkogFJLoMxaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:11:48 -0000

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
> comment to make.

I do believe there is a value in this document being published. The
contents very much reflect the operational  reality of $employer; both
on the technical issues at hand, and the related practices we now take
as a result.  And I believe this will be a useful document for the
context of other papers relating to fragments.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email