IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067891ACD0D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UePkQZewiBju for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D7F1ACD09 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) with ESMTP id f81f1555.2b6af403f940.4045280.00-2449.11349152.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5551f18f0c581f54-d8c5b8e05c27a54e3c92657a91f0f32f6702ee87
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id e81f1555.0.4045277.00-2309.11349119.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <bs7652@att.com>); Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5551f18f679a3042-2323d54dddcc87f87d6f02493826edceb36beb49
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4CCQrD4028443; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:54 -0400
Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4CCQk0Y028422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:50 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.155]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:33 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.168]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.155]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:32 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
Thread-Index: AQHQjACNux2KUONiXECSYNX4GNUcGZ13f2sAgAAs/4CAABRqgIAABJEAgADAIgD//74hwA==
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:33 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130FF2B42@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <555112D8.3000008@gmail.com> <1592568679.113935.1431386263763.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <41D8A9FE-0324-4DDF-8868-5187F122F9A7@nominum.com> <CE02D71F-93AA-4441-85AE-CD0DF1DDD095@cisco.com> <16AE7703-1288-40F6-9CD9-29196986B8C6@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <16AE7703-1288-40F6-9CD9-29196986B8C6@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.247.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=Id0wrxWa c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=C4nbiDwpsDIA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP]
X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:10 a=e1gdrVnHO]
X-AnalysisOut: [N_SV2tnMgUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <bs7652@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PsyUOZqd8V2kDhgwnJiB40bpxyk>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:26:57 -0000

<snip>
> That said, if we are talking about
> homenet ... <snip>

I don't see that draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices has any applicability to homenet. The design-choices draft states up front that the applicable network is one being designed (i.e., "managed") by someone "who is knowledgeable about best current practices around IPv4 network design, and wishes to learn the corresponding practices for IPv6". That puts homenet way, way out of scope. IMO, it's really about enterprise networks.
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email