Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit.txt
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 02:53 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9DD133344 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCQkKXejnX4u for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A972F133038 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u142so4422590ywg.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XiUVCbnyl9f/5dkhZBYpX6SnN9/Xqm13lp370rqHTU8=; b=jXlzDl74GchChRpmY4IkbyEEwnOYEI9BSUoTKnFxuYxL7eSYrrOX10CrG5fq/SnYc0 yHHOoEYtvxD39W8fpuggSjRIxY+iEUo4sMGIy3QqxBPE5pJV3yek6TpFzw2YKZBYieKK 65bQb+jNqrCQxseic26c1HazEgAD6JKfyivVC326pVI+7AxsUk5Alt6EL0kcLbc0x7LD aTBxmb5pQ8LhKbhUJwtDCilMYb9+nPAe27Y6SHFvfvrns8n46URbH9E/xaTBo3gzhz0p uWw3VdABlLItBsKZ/+4hHJ/jvnQ7Kydu8RmF8M2/rG27GWqrnCOB7CMyfzPb2h8WWqjk Lmwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XiUVCbnyl9f/5dkhZBYpX6SnN9/Xqm13lp370rqHTU8=; b=JdPMfPUWm+YQvJd9IzM9t5CDsfNKDLitVqygi7fF5/sabeyB/5MDwGstNi+74G/X0/ YUEaVa6UVVxnbTHbDNgyUSLo+IT4djjJQ0Hlss/9NO50HgpUo6haYyJIB+hc+UDwP1iS v09TIIvEnh4c5RIwd8SdQGcEoQduJjmIophaOrRBOs0HifXvyOgvyqlvgraVICv+yaHN rnJY9oCyoeSVkrsXhnJDmb8j1zMI4ijHXBP4qBFGLx2BxIumRt4mT3c4KehWkNvAd+TW RTab8CilEXK0s9JDAgFYgR3+3xyw8e0BrqzErTsDkiHDj/hk8eQ7sBr7S6BkfoiE9ZrP hOGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXHozUotAMzoPbKOeO62dHS4dDOmHZ6zAbU8hk8yxAW3ldZL8Vv xNIJ/nD7a74Po7muGRGitOonoVlfR+apBPPynrluUPby
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TPPbMM0bdgsz2JeEI9SB/+4TJUVLzbEET6Xtj2cmPtRFWsfNOQp9zy5qQTjrAaECX2Jk9fMJf0VOxY1YyYG5A=
X-Received: by 10.37.15.194 with SMTP id 185mr4419806ybp.458.1508554408598; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.212.210 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 19:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E4585AE25F8@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
References: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E4585AE25F8@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 11:53:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxo7cWrRyGnjT+94YiW2dEvo4zyxBYbviTk4VpeVcp+98A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="001a113f5feaad5e64055c05b1a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/R4LECncAJ6kyIutV9RfCvRYU1kw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:53:31 -0000
On 20 October 2017 at 22:56, Mudric, Dusan (Dusan) <dmudric@avaya.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02#section-5.2.2.2 > > It is free to assign any address formed > > from an exclusive prefix to any available interface > > > > Is it? What if a host has two interfaces connected to two ISPs that assign > exclusive prefixes? Each interface would end up with two ‘exclusive’ > prefixes. Can they be still called ‘exclusive’? In the sense that no other node on either network will receive traffic to any address within the prefix(es), yes.
- [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-excl… Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-… Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)