IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6407E134462 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Fv8toza-Yo4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CE2134313 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 101so15128051ioj.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sLtRzsp+aCZET86H7Mhu7Eai53tKRoOjSnKBiLmDTXo=; b=CnGsTIctQQdL23FKDbjlgb/CwqUHusMyGfJPgwTfXz/tOoglUjXm3xar8w7FgZG4kW 3MTG+TfWB9cRB8x2N3nYiEkOh4M5bsvVZI8Q73u7Dc5txUptOPPI1y8sBi9vlcF3S+uq MLB405OZVqgqx9thmSWhpKRoG30XbH71M5sUNrvZ/gMX3bnMwc3TbtmNDyW8kw+FjwIS BJXnBWrPuVA9zkHh/D+kPXsQF4P4YJp4uLtcl3LKhRpbwBbUK9DWFqvBhBuBJ6qumgAa cdg50B4SCYyM48WjLGczFXer1xgAbIbSLhNZ0y8MspSAO0nT+4cKOmAu9wiWUsOfR8VO kC1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sLtRzsp+aCZET86H7Mhu7Eai53tKRoOjSnKBiLmDTXo=; b=PiTVgviDkuRYkWXt89TU65Mempt5j8NQu2UiYuRQ5QS6Ss3WfpvVRc0WuzSdzjAkyL Nb0NSOGWkNM6idPNodPWNZ8NxyhUCGKWLlgUNJb5tziXYwYEs/fkBrGixuxY56ywhsge XwRTyLYO9s7iKgpkuWyMXGlGED1w7DwV4wKk9jg1j6WDWW/C++NcJSGSayC7xAL5DzBD PEjtfHu5ZznJwQBMCXi7+ChK0gpSSCaux44VmMMHh7b/HNdlwic8Le2Rnlifsf+odl+y qDUZlNAiQPQGuF9WTO/4Q3KaKzHUNwAK4C9Aivx3OJd3Cpym4tL9VZXUpsI1marUaw6+ m+Zg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVwteGLyJxsDdNHG5GQsyeBDekEMM9qDb57xTBlT19jBRCj1wEM 5o0hXUDSQrkSfPSmjwcgcVx77xz0reBtr8ZZNyYTCw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T1UmBfSv5JhQ2tTGgIeOsNzaqc7vFqn79vdAG0pY/JI+CnxU6BvZX7VlKyPo/xUNBbrCkTlN8WibCBKTOiE2I=
X-Received: by 10.107.183.129 with SMTP id h123mr9458832iof.23.1508555513746; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.82.19 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.82.19 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMA4qiWMFDWmcFLpmTsOm096YHggY1yrx4A3-TuHjGR=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150853234997.15403.8100492287000664954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <eb737375-1bf5-1e1d-3539-2821058870c5@gmail.com> <CABcZeBMA4qiWMFDWmcFLpmTsOm096YHggY1yrx4A3-TuHjGR=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:11:52 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2YKeZ+zk_0P0ux4LzS55_JXWSxbVXY52So-kxK4hmpVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: "Brian E. Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c032c85db25055c05f3a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/HU6M2I8CPPNTQOf6_EIvzlfuDKU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 03:11:56 -0000

On Oct 21, 2017 06:31, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

I don't think that's a political desire. IPv6 in general works better,
> because it isn't encumbered by NAT.


Can you please provide a reference to a measurement showing that this is
true?


How about
https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-load-20-40-faster-over-ipv6/
?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email