IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F1D13446D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWSIKXNwBqdY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B2513420B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m81so15124787ioi.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E2bZKEOKaOv1L/yQLYbELqa8apx26fRrV+y3djDl5Ac=; b=TB6nvVfQKNmnB6VfQllsUYmR3iGdJPo0cCdaUdu/skZooZZXUo4Quq2yMeJ7rvjYqa UBsxcb0bFqc6kWddMvplnZ3vJTv7z1Qu1WxX4cFxGWoufWFtAfn8wusDoAO9IY7QXy2U 2dw2EoegNkw6XaDknGymp/2yogQsPapI7A7n6p5dKOIb5sg1spEsPo0paQ7E0wENbfvY VAcocCW8psif4fE5Jq4Pr1jboR+N0NXIZdT1BhRAX+GbSraIVDL4v7QBZiVUWBP/zUle Q+vxc9eLHyHI6TwrsCHVEUhSZAYE31+VeKYQkWoJFBxJ+WZG6NGFtCfNyYFU4x9ynAca t3Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E2bZKEOKaOv1L/yQLYbELqa8apx26fRrV+y3djDl5Ac=; b=TmusfFPhobYa/mJef4Pd50bzur5fltQ2d501XcmYOCqQPPsQ/d+S89TFStNVJEAU0M jnGLDcWzcmUV1bi3kn8gXgwHSHaz+IraZHMe4FTTXk6Z4f1HGGVoFfAs/VbW0zP3ZbOi oDnYJFPFsVqcMtdJdz8XxoU5PoPwAJEMPgGsoV5v76PV/mJMmuphiaDf5UxOXwJ/CN3U z9AbUT2oKqOU2NAmwZ+5MFlafQp90TWPY3WhucokqkGQQy9JYJ6wHLfMIIqetBjV7KeJ iycI5mm+asyR+fjwPZSSajGhC2lvkeKTI/ql0peYB8pB4kqh7uO79VqR0kT056yzPBUR A7kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU2IkkdVhbxHzDog3fnnWWe3ZxBHoVFqtly5sOlck5yDNg2h8Ei z033b0mGueHmm0T09DPrrGbv1dBspIUZrRbD6ZNNpQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QILnZhcv3x2YHTuUhLvpnd60aq6R4G6U8jWB3bpEpz9aIk6dwasOjFFgRl/oYwFifqEWDyiAInw9/9pSBWt/w=
X-Received: by 10.107.174.94 with SMTP id x91mr8762805ioe.224.1508556973266; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.82.19 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNa0_gJ-RX6hjfBpFRG7Zj3P3VTNKyqEciJDF=sSvutgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150853234997.15403.8100492287000664954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <eb737375-1bf5-1e1d-3539-2821058870c5@gmail.com> <CABcZeBMA4qiWMFDWmcFLpmTsOm096YHggY1yrx4A3-TuHjGR=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2YKeZ+zk_0P0ux4LzS55_JXWSxbVXY52So-kxK4hmpVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNa0_gJ-RX6hjfBpFRG7Zj3P3VTNKyqEciJDF=sSvutgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:35:52 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0id00npJFAH-hqO9SxfmW2nJ4ONovTgSD3dAp1VU5jog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: "Brian E. Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a242848853055c064a35"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/aBkgFh0eARi3NR-PQA6axFNUr78>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 03:36:16 -0000

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> This is consistent both with people with IPv6 having faster networks and
> with IPv6 being faster than IPv4 on dual-stack devices. Only the latter
> would motivate the recommendation in this draft.
>

IIRC the Facebook experiment measured the latter. See for example
https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/meetings/NANOG64/1033/20150602_Huston_The_Benefits_Of_v3.pdf
.

Clearly, it's just one measurement and the results may vary.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email