IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF613445C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cPtyVdh_5keN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEADB134478 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w5so7976169ywg.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5CDljp7vUkRe+d2G8zCIvgyh8UzlY4i7ENXRDM9v3Wo=; b=TrhG1skANhnBxVKR4hz8vKqnmVAN3XLU+LTYYSLD1wtu3B1e+kOPVu/35dRF9PORet buRTJegpp7JrftHmmrlErushDNcgHTSDzS59IsfR4Vmp4/iZqe+/57Fm6YotVXix1+GR kc87OZ0w+Ti/6uy7cm3VPiCub4rpwQMKZYfklbG1FcUATv9oL3uf4yKfY3zA10WCZbld RscmHa7/HzsBwFAY9u9rViQpago6vEyZ+L9lLYbA3XYV01zK/K2BjszEM0oBtC2uDa9L ThYeGmnTqizY0AyHLFWBDcheCx54FBbb06cSQ/0otIRb7YTA4A6W6wlOvEyQpwmctnXR vdOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5CDljp7vUkRe+d2G8zCIvgyh8UzlY4i7ENXRDM9v3Wo=; b=SU2wPTRxqdXbzYy8gM6briEcqQsB5cDyJhaVkoWTTi2+oZlHyQY4i41+6dWyJ9lIiZ Be660AX3yThHYQvYjyfHRB2a7KROa1D0Q9c/RDngCiTkqfjnXm91GCMPRoUZuux2OTjp FBSXcELaTEmqsMDKYx0G7o8y8rovEUPUaSWvaRgQoBu9ixqsR/r9xXGdNXp6EvPuu2fY VfmF6mhf5LZxUexT0SshNbHlI33yB17M5iLgwIBd52dtcHmuidvOKB+nHw7N/LKNrSbn Nbismt7FaggKEFkBehW2LiRA809DYjECbnvVKRoc/PuBDHXgwljoX9YAdAuN4b9egWLG 6eeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVouctk0Wd4UTFjVDg1MQIuQWlbDyY0eALBinPy2yOmS4ndGKtn 9VZJQiaCWvHwIuVf7TxxfX8QvDRuAq9rYVEWs9gqjA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+S3cE0WeI9e7jw7Sif0GKWPfYdAwz3zz0IGEW+9ayq4NIY/FK4RQyNOYw5CxkVScBTeFSfYVG/genyuMQ/w/Kw=
X-Received: by 10.129.167.66 with SMTP id e63mr4780377ywh.294.1508557215295; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.75.194 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0id00npJFAH-hqO9SxfmW2nJ4ONovTgSD3dAp1VU5jog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150853234997.15403.8100492287000664954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <eb737375-1bf5-1e1d-3539-2821058870c5@gmail.com> <CABcZeBMA4qiWMFDWmcFLpmTsOm096YHggY1yrx4A3-TuHjGR=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2YKeZ+zk_0P0ux4LzS55_JXWSxbVXY52So-kxK4hmpVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNa0_gJ-RX6hjfBpFRG7Zj3P3VTNKyqEciJDF=sSvutgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0id00npJFAH-hqO9SxfmW2nJ4ONovTgSD3dAp1VU5jog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:39:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPmH_ujB6Cn-7s0qjXPzbjgpJAvUovaTr_hOYbFg1P3NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: "Brian E. Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c079026f10642055c0658d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/RWfLeJRbs3fY2BOhm0r3i5nnde0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 03:40:19 -0000

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
>> This is consistent both with people with IPv6 having faster networks and
>> with IPv6 being faster than IPv4 on dual-stack devices. Only the latter
>> would motivate the recommendation in this draft.
>>
>
> IIRC the Facebook experiment measured the latter. See for example
> https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/meetings/
> NANOG64/1033/20150602_Huston_The_Benefits_Of_v3.pdf .
>

It's hard to tell just what they were measuring, but you'll note that the
first slide of the Facebook section says "No A/B Testing" which suggests
the opposite.

-Ekr


> Clearly, it's just one measurement and the results may vary.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email