Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPv6] [OPSEC] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 26 May 2023 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00841C151536; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgqRalNz97-j; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5D9C151087; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1002] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4:c::1002]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63B4728018B; Fri, 26 May 2023 12:36:17 -0300 (-03)
Message-ID: <d9b86705-463c-c754-6e47-5b21917f9aa5@gont.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 17:36:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Albert E Manfredi <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, opsec@ietf.org
References: <11087a11-476c-5fb8-2ede-e1b3b6e95e48@si6networks.com> <CALx6S343f_FPXVxuZuXB4j=nY-SuTEYrnxb3O5OQ3fv5uPwT8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1pTVr6ak9rc9x7irg+aLhq0N8_WOyySqx5Syt74HMX=g@mail.gmail.com> <a087b963-1e12-66bf-b93e-5190ce09914b@si6networks.com> <CALx6S349nNA8L5+_1hrbWayqp8GfTYypWy_SP57c_Xxams=csg@mail.gmail.com> <51a066b3-4b4c-d573-ffbe-d6b44a4f193f@gont.com.ar> <a411a1b0-c521-c456-3d44-d99a1cc0975b@gmail.com> <CWXP265MB5153E4687BE45480DBC5A531C2439@CWXP265MB5153.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <27d28224-0cb0-eec2-8d54-f0d175596c85@gmail.com> <f5758380-9967-b67b-744d-dc36b7b599ab@si6networks.com> <72784f8e65f34bcc9f5652c0a553c70c@boeing.com> <CALx6S373P2X-JRbCNpOCGuq_Cum0+OzJFRBkuQ64h5R52B7Dhw@mail.gmail.com> <222731ea012b4b0ebd7a51f72b5bcd40@boeing.com> <dd61024e-1bd8-ff3d-216f-22cc7600ad10@gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJyXiT=O5cMyy08bVq+U7VTtKTkR_60OfvrcCng8Joe5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJyXiT=O5cMyy08bVq+U7VTtKTkR_60OfvrcCng8Joe5w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UZS-oydLsWubNToAvpU6Zob-Q80>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPv6] [OPSEC] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 15:36:58 -0000

Hi, Warren,

On 26/5/23 11:03, Warren Kumari wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter 
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
[....]
> 
>     A well-implemented host will not be troubled by unkown extension
>     headers or options.
> 
> 
> Indeed. However, not all hosts are well-implemented.

Indeed. Datapoint: 
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=IPv6+extension+header

Smarter searching/keywords will at least double the results.


-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar
PGP Fingerprint: 7F7F 686D 8AC9 3319 EEAD C1C8 D1D5 4B94 E301 6F01