IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-00.txt

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Fri, 30 October 2015 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4ED51B3480 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mn-q3nju_GYN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3681B347E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkfw189 with SMTP id w189so39131002vkf.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=swSYanMD3LS2u9yapDn4TPBuzs1nPNHzKNmzgZgJUpk=; b=nRkwbX6OYkGOLt2PJS751G/xvVoe8sG9C78kKZ+VIh/Gjyc6JS6W68EOdglXhWL/qP O0qkGC/9LP4tx6fKsnuD72kYbI0cBhMxz5sD9CsGm4yBQpE4HdyM7+AXXwRPnT+OaKM4 z1UFaaFc7YmLB3SAsn1HF1SUXPqd4mTo3Zu9f6xipVw6ieQmzGgXFvuQ8nKrd8zfwrWh +XqC5rlwz71HvyI+NgX+44Ff7odpAeI2vpVIF0aD5zXj6PMVI5KEvGwGar5WAu3mkwsR SDWl7FN2a3vwJ8HyfG6BIOXHyTGYFvwNS+vm1USiOv3vZgh6K0imavyPHTEdrBP9oN0q PXuA==
X-Received: by 10.31.33.75 with SMTP id h72mr3776129vkh.144.1446171169534; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.67.194 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F33FD3@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <20151019195001.22760.2580.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5AB28826-8E45-461F-AA7B-5D45F218FC18@cisco.com> <20151028113851.530c649d@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <CAJE_bqd1263SaqU61sqqk_4Tne1GzE4_kMUhuLMgY42Cyc6m_A@mail.gmail.com> <5631232E.4020701@gmail.com> <20151029203951.06a4d4fd@envy.fud.no> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F33F22@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5632952C.5030604@gmail.com> <5EFCC4F7-802D-48A2-B4C3-CEA884559E08@employees.org> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F33FD3@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:12:19 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2x9+juQ6WKqoiij_MP+2UdJLEURznO4bb9cBU3JcNFkGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZSS7dVzub_XJ8OZmt_9uge9v7ho>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:12:52 -0000

Hi Fred,

On 30 October 2015 at 09:03, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
<snip>
>
> The same as what Ole said. Also, an IPv6-over-(foo) document can specify that
> DHCPv6-only autoconfiguration is used on that link.

Do any exist that state that?

I'd hope in that case the IPv6-over-(foo) document mentions that if a
stateful DHCPv6 server is not available, the hosts are only left with
link-local addresses to use for all IPv6 operations and applications.


Regards,
Mark.


> In that way, IPv6 nodes
> that connect to a (foo) link already known in advance what sorts of link
> ND/DHCPv6 services they can expect.
>
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>
>> Best regards,
>> Ole
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email