IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-00.txt

otroan@employees.org Fri, 30 October 2015 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8BE1B2A5D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmyV5STGPntT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A7D1B2A5C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80625D7882; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=FWqX/DWeZggfQGhUfswrJgRXE9A=; b= drXZptFdSXIybU8HdWRQnTdRfLf8yNpBkU5XPrHeNpMHE0TcnKsBbEg1z7MpRCWo wXhMyYjIu6C3ng4GTvzdyN2+LE1amjOYijJKRjwqZ5DVMiWM+45lakTwFt0MyIRY hDQSNGROTHNvETfNxJGcvbvJVJzDHjz4983m04x723U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=DAe/Ifk+g7kZd31USKgRWf/mWe uZGBwxPOOHE83917UjJuxZcV7iSomDGMLiHwNYByKqYyR04+HPfC0vuDExBwny0E o2h59lgMtO3wB166nTtCtoz9OY265xjO82bx5oA4H4VD4F2u2Az/Y7opQiLV24cK qPY9aiaeMxwt9+VZ0=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (unknown [103.5.140.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 632C7D7884; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF57FC61B; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:01:39 +0900 (JST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3014239D-2179-4378-BFDB-91D2D7EAE5ED"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <5632A16C.50809@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:01:38 +0900
Message-Id: <F02803C7-C39E-4024-B320-3F34E96DEB18@employees.org>
References: <20151019195001.22760.2580.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5AB28826-8E45-461F-AA7B-5D45F218FC18@cisco.com> <20151028113851.530c649d@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com> <CAJE_bqd1263SaqU61sqqk_4Tne1GzE4_kMUhuLMgY42Cyc6m_A@mail.gmail.com> <5631232E.4020701@gmail.com> <20151029203951.06a4d4fd@envy.fud.no> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F33F22@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5632952C.5030604@gmail.com> <5EFCC4F7-802D-48A2-B4C3-CEA884559E08@employees.org> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F33FD3@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5632A16C.50809@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bpJsiH5jz0Mte0Okrxa6MyikwwY>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 01:01:44 -0000

Brian,

[off topic warning]

>>> in the 7084 case:
>>> we've tied the CE router's default routing to ND Router Discovery.
> 
> Right... which is a safe choice, because it's consistent with RFC 6434.

well, the choice isn't all that obvious. implementations/deployments do also vary.
the most obvious choice is a routing protocol.

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email