IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8123A6DB9 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.865
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BA3tE5-2+RLD for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFCE3A6DAE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.81]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oAG75GdU024870 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:16 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1289891117; bh=KaVUppcgubUF2nAiayd7C5hfY88=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=uw9lskVooWZp6jluvTMIDTTjMd7vQG+JhzqKnVmSMdu0yGc5G8lTpyPJ4N+0gPVgj anoZKaI69X2ugh7RQXdsg==
Received: from qyk36 (qyk36.prod.google.com [10.241.83.164]) by wpaz17.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oAG74lua031391 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:15 -0800
Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so417597qyk.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xhco1ZzkrO7OtyRLILFpjaqvmpwObWddtDjgTKnYI28=; b=C9D4MSTZ8ABTbLjSnPN90p0/scgboW4skUEZDOY9C/J7IHg9gL/eiPp40D8Olrznba JyJL1zRVhNI18DJQkECg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=knAaC5Oan9/tyji3T6KcKp4twuvs2F3AZQetZJie8ZhaF2d1JQRw8L0EzRqO+5l2qM jaGA/suuShz+TBBt+j4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.73.193 with SMTP id r1mr5944845qcj.257.1289891113816; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.78.228 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:05:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011160751020.1154@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <C9012E21.BE148%Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com> <475FED03-071D-47E1-8FA8-A28656E05784@asgaard.org> <AANLkTi=s1XNeJep2JqhpjC4V7Nuhnwqv+JxYa6ueYiRG@mail.gmail.com> <D0BFB338-F661-4F54-ADB6-3990875DBD52@cdl.asgaard.org> <4F6983B2-012B-460C-B782-39BB4AF2DB41@virtualized.org> <1DCF100D-812D-4706-AAAE-3D1A4FF68BBF@cdl.asgaard.org> <9D2A16A0-7B28-4AB1-8260-E03DB76D2819@gmail.com> <A69639AF-02E3-4DBC-8796-71F70AA07455@cdl.asgaard.org> <41F0C4A8-2DDA-42A4-B5D0-297BA751F062@virtualized.org> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011160751020.1154@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:05:13 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=MSqN4oJaPL4p2EhmfOLwTBEt+Y+wmm998Y=tu@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <ietf@cdl.asgaard.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, opsawg@ietf.org, ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Heads up - Plea for allocating a /8 to ISPs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:06:30 -0000

On 16 November 2010 15:52, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, David Conrad wrote:
>
>> b) having somebody go to one of the RIRs and get the space, then making
>> that space NAT444 space for everybody (e.g., like what Microsoft did with
>> 169.254.0.0/16)
>
> Isn't 169.254.0.0/16 an excellent network to use for NAT444 ? I agree that
> it's not that huge, but it's still 64k addresses, one would have to make
> sure the CGN can handle interface context (multiple instances of the same
> space) and then one would be good to go. It's there, using LL between CPE
> and ISP actually sounds perfect, that's what I want to do for IPv6 as well

+1  Or 198.18.0.0/15?  =)

But I would guess that supporters of this NAT444 stuff have already
picked over the things that http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5735 has to
offer.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email