IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Wed, 04 December 2019 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E16120025 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:10:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFNt9mpRER2Q for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494AF120019 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.135] (host-79-121-42-101.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xB4GA9H3059271 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:10:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-101.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.101] claimed to be [192.168.1.135]
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CAFU7BAR1JLUZps=CAqJfeQtUf-xQ88RYvgYrPCP+QP0Ter7YFg@mail.gmail.com> <8736e0gqu2.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E29BB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <adece97c-5ac1-6a80-85fc-2b5ee4075a7d@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:10:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E29BB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FBBEF7AC68976DAAB3256338"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.2 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.101; helo=[192.168.1.135]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/d2KQLVvO9DUm1Ezo0X-FOmHpQ5I>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 16:10:21 -0000

Hi Med,

12/4/2019 2:56 PM keltezéssel, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com írta:
> A host that discovers the presence of NAT64 (because a pref64 was discovered) can safely release any assigned IPv4 address.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but I do not agree. Unfortunately 
not all applications are compatible with NAT64. Please see our results in:

S. Répás, T. Hajas and G. Lencse, "Application Compatibility of the 
NAT64 IPv6 Transition Technology", /Proceedings of the 37th 
International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing 
(TSP 2014)/, (Berlin, Germany, 2014. July, 1-3.) Brno University of 
Technology, pp. 49-55. DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2015.7296383
Full text is available from: 
http://www.hit.bme.hu/~lencse/publications/TSP-2014-AC.pdf

Best regards,

Gábor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email