IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 20 February 2019 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673C129741 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 07:03:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfF1A65bnHLI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93A32130E2E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 07:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF13B41CDB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:03:11 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99C041B56; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:03:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id BB691B62FF; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:03:11 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:03:11 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc: gert@space.net, jordi.palet@consulintel.es, fgont@si6networks.com, v6ops@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190220150311.GO71606@Space.Net>
References: <6D78F4B2-A30D-4562-AC21-E4D3DE019D90@consulintel.es> <20190220113603.GK71606@Space.Net> <20190220.130245.526931615.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20190220144222.GL71606@Space.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DeQ9GnsEQp3CI+P2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190220144222.GL71606@Space.Net>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/h6hasd_cQEgmMXPRsz42PtqAGIo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:03:19 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:42:22PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Then, there's market and IETF process fails

Ooooh, I totally forgot the "RA vs. DHCPv6" train wreck.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email