[v6ops] Happy Eyeballs and SIP

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Mon, 07 March 2011 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A773A693D for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WI6RlyfBo4Vv for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns.webway.se (ns.webway.se [87.96.134.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393BE3A6827 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.40.17] (unknown [192.168.40.17]) by ns.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6392128426 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:40:21 +0100 (CET)
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:40:20 +0100
Message-Id: <83928D99-9809-4BF9-A710-28366AF46BBB@edvina.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [v6ops] Happy Eyeballs and SIP
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:39:10 -0000

Hi!

Has anyone considered the issues covered in the happy-eyeballs draft for SIP?

A 19 or 32 second time out when placing a call is not a good user experience... I think this applies to SIP over TCP, and possibly also needs to be handled for UDP.
I don't see this handled in the draft for IPv6 transition in the Session Initiation Protocol (soon-to-be RFC 6157)

Seems like the scope of the happy eyeballs draft is HTTP, so the question is if this should be expanded or if we need other drafts for other protocols.

Regards,
/Olle

Ref: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07