IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D821AD4A1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGh3VLTvoEUa for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 436C41A916C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30ED3DA008A; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:24:34 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EB11ED2B-ADC9-462A-945D-7C04FBBB9535"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <m1ZJfOr-0000CgC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:24:33 -0400
Message-ID: <C9C3FBC4-44F3-45D2-B8C4-3725396E5D40@nominum.com>
References: <20150723130715.12113.47480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55B1ED14.6030501@gmail.com> <m1ZIZ4w-0000CbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr2z6T86gmQMPZwbgFB4mdt7=xWNuei5jaQg=vpG7-zLVg@mail.gmail.com> <m1ZJdjZ-0000CcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20150727091241.GL84167@Space.Net> <m1ZJfOr-0000CgC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mEGR3VRY2iwxLmLXI7Xa2NcoKxg>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:24:36 -0000

On Jul 27, 2015, at 6:12 AM, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> My reasoning is, you want DHCPv6-PD for hosts if hosts are doing DHCPv6 because
> otherwise they would have to obtain losts of DHCPv6 leases.

You don’t want them to obtain lots of DHCPv6 leases.   Why would that be a good idea?   I would suggest ten as an upper limit, and that’s easily addressed with IA_NA.   IA_PD would be overkill, and hosts don’t support it anyway.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email