IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 10 December 2019 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69425120020 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:51:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FfMM0gy8O3Hv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D0F12021C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id s64so1271807pgb.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=JMzt8bcGe66R/DxP/K6hkq7xN7vDaYeEQrcAocN4HCk=; b=qgiCN2Zmth/hTDc6GAM64PY8bntDg3922EJLtNjFgJWM0uluLcwZcl1/z5ml4GH3GU Rvw3uLR3rJDVevmOrv6bXlZH9QAPaga03QRHTyb3y0krgRWsu6VxiQKcaGsYEToUi16O N5cFj5CwhZGITLjvJl7d9yAvuccEK4mYphQ+nAbWjNaWu1cr3aAJpLfOzegYfTVIwf5S OnInchh2ao4XEBw0ZwjSscrfyUsk3xph4bPAl3hwkGgjpkb9BZszoBIxoRZyeRKUew5V 7Dhb/36Y6xhhIkh3/eaP6XiOttfYObnySIY+oH37A0JbZ4eqozLRSCF9LGFzHK9Vrsvj 1Jmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=JMzt8bcGe66R/DxP/K6hkq7xN7vDaYeEQrcAocN4HCk=; b=MPGOJLlV5IHK/tXkzvOa/4MeBtDkGMp9dRl0jhpdSh35nArA1M9tBdCChDM5ngZ+fK DmtBGLs6QPIYW45GxsWYfo+R0d56v+mjyPDr1iDOKgUKp6VyNhjUkgX31IRsqI5tligG voK7Po5i3WsE00dbvc9kS7bEbxvfYHIhb8+MHhyv8DdWfVKgoW04KKFDgK6QBm1wdpV3 Q4dr0ZWMsoP5WGlH/VahnB/GjnZqx+TNDty1rGt6yOFQhPJ4u+8PhoJm8Obp74zG4hr/ ym1BAGZ+Oscp6+7kB9xg7BORzoNaIc9VWGDET19t1r96luN4hA62jcr0AqKTWoF16Qqt MHYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXO8flt2lK5rES4aT9Runf1ndIZVWy15Hzf4MUESDXiTwnbNAoG wgP4gGLBFHCt3wL4Ecc8UdxQNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOESRnvzy1gHfMXvrfw9MoNTF+RoZQy9/e4w1rJM909mwRZTqJCflB8OinR628u2o95lzlZQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:213:: with SMTP id 19mr2605880pgc.160.1575939063229; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from encantada.scv.apple.com ([17.192.138.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c1sm656804pfa.51.2019.12.09.16.51.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:51:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <C4A987A8-8B23-4F55-95D9-4D6B19C98392@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DB7A0532-746A-4680-BB7F-6EECF9FCD8BB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:51:00 -0800
In-Reply-To: <45763b7f-1d76-78b0-5d7f-6469b25a007c@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org" <draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
References: <CAFU7BAR1JLUZps=CAqJfeQtUf-xQ88RYvgYrPCP+QP0Ter7YFg@mail.gmail.com> <32A5E9AF-60E8-413D-B724-400363F32B09@fugue.com> <DM6PR11MB4137D1FD0EB273C41886E307CF5D0@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <45763b7f-1d76-78b0-5d7f-6469b25a007c@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mF1TTo_qQ6gNWLbnYZRh5a-BLzU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:51:07 -0000

On Dec 9, 2019, at 4:35 PM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:
> With that in mind, I tried to find the lowest option code that's
> available. I was not able to find any specific information about prior
> use of codes 102-107, except RFC3679 saying they were returned (and thus
> previously used by someone). Code 108 seems safer than other codes - it
> is below 128, RFC3679 explicitly says that there was an idea to use it
> for swap path, but that must have died quickly if no I-D was ever
> published about it. So it seems like a safe bet.

I tend to agree.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email