IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 09 December 2019 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0931200B6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:44:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Uk_jEpkurXz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 380701200D5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id 2so7411208pfg.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:44:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=rC+goQvJLX769BTR63UcEePtq40vvb90gLDZsHUDV5g=; b=k+OE0A/j6M4+NMsB0LNKk/4HuWAnr9GmkHqjgS7HCdNBj6TBOpWSmf+9w07Pd0S+iV jPXi6SBDwkaYLbzBTcmwfmhKSSg0ao5OY+HENuMBFHkmpkRFrsXP/RuOyXO5tqjO63Y4 /wtG3kveV/UhYrhK29Bc2u0UOxX5/6rhcnOZnJac3LL53gg8smHcZ9H1h+E0ze+YW/zP hfPY3+QOs+6WfghnANSWuUIs3i8585y6Ne1Ym8eTYs3s+rutXvOsBwOt02bsMmiohA8d 2SPS2XZwhXDtUuB9hJ+JAhuKqlLUd7GQzrirdV6GURIXbT5RpBuAZA9uHXVJWyrLxQxe D5UA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=rC+goQvJLX769BTR63UcEePtq40vvb90gLDZsHUDV5g=; b=WrgFu4DXAgUabuZ1xCBbc5xxnNBSLZlFi4Z+HCb6SqiiGcxOrTvjea0wfgOfZc978d Q13T4bSGCO0avJD5ULObR9a7IT4FTD8EzPLDqOlcwdVncAcNEVZfa8C40UbDZP751MpX 5sbRJNmHhEy8vKzLTP1AVTuLhRq6wq/d+MHqo2KH9B/B0iYkYTROJj+PqV3yje2YCrLQ TZ41pro7WOUl8YX5x4+mVSz0s8X3Rj3PYjZdmIF/djZMY91o5jyIqaVw4YeNRTNIeQG8 rUqRvp66HV8/Z4KyKIYBNBFH9y+5AqV+2NL+3ftk/f/OksfdYQGECqxAGoIdNg++pMPV Tffg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfhWQMgALuESgUzmQ4QL1Xg27O1AmbcJ6SAB3c8R4OUYdciCZS UotrhC9zTaquDZNMmeW/H3oSfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsCTIVWDiQcMlz+xIQdLWqYUAnE9QQ7pDd9JQI1jZcaYT835wHfUC8zrNiYGmEqJps4xW5tQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:647:: with SMTP id 68mr19349208pgg.202.1575906264702; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.144.152] ([144.178.28.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f9sm5919607pfd.141.2019.12.09.07.44.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:44:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B8319B81-812C-48B4-82C7-31EB5584AC4D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3E96A52F-540E-4102-9C85-06FE08F641AB"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 07:44:22 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1fKSno-m8hRHkOP-_=ZazW7o8354x0L4_S-7MhzASGDA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <F5AAD5B7-22BD-4474-9A1E-1A97AFFE47FC@cisco.com> <1655AE1A-EF2E-4720-BFBE-FA512CC4D240@cisco.com> <85E7ECA2-3538-48D7-99CB-7E978E7C0F03@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1qSV4mzAqP7hNWKHbppQmJ=r-ajdFRfdscfvukhdUf=A@mail.gmail.com> <BA520BC5-1286-4C66-8B55-AA56322F721B@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1fKSno-m8hRHkOP-_=ZazW7o8354x0L4_S-7MhzASGDA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/p3vkC5ShZhjnW4w09qzezxHnPvc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:44:27 -0000

On Dec 9, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> Can we simply say that those clients cannot use this option, then? It seems unfortunate to say that well-behaved clients that do know how to use the PRL should have to add the option to their request packets outside the PRL.

The trouble is, I don’t know how prevalent this problem is.  Maybe it’s okay, though—just looking at my own desktop computer, it definitely does seem to be sending a PRL.   Does Android also?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email