IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-04

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 14 November 2023 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9747C151080 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:28:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72I0zoBx_Sso for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:6::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1719FC14CE31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:28:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A21FE2A9F; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=3dQ08wedOBIkIHvb Ix2qKWfrF4jJj22cg6X5cWDtWeY=; b=LgTY9iewWIVDCSmw8mKxQh+wMH7KQV0D JNUD6pCoO/sZO3wXpq0oVxBz2V4aQ+x+zWtYsJbclZddCIyP46jol5oKFesF0rv1 /wScqrQGi+j+C9ohHBAjNQkfXSsa60NHTJ/za5on9OQlL8yUiWgUTjT1GE/9LMdT lCwJIRrKm2exi0R21dtnJNkwuwGoHgRRcLNoK/khINZbgrvIPncg545La37O1Bi0 ooUzS+K2ZcGpYqeDm6gJloXqw2J9EA3p8k44y/DZXfXzJpyImUN+ZrYKyHoVzMzx 5jlpja4/2SdpUpn711Qri0r2eQw+A5LpdbTQv8+3wzd70nifbdNAhw==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 49E79E2A82; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:4650:c3ed:37a:1e9f:54b:1ba9:d468]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD7AE4E11A6A; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:28:18 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJgLMKs=rCG019Sjaf2tuJhEX6s7Uo_hYjPv_izFNo83zhYrTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:28:05 +0100
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A52D975-0CC2-425B-914A-8A76572D5811@employees.org>
References: <b35c7737f1b54a848f23b2fc9d54993f@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=DYLN1vRox8Ld+96Bf6=iy-hEat5RbVC6xuPo2QMrieQ@mail.gmail.com> <6eb00cab-30d4-45fa-9cd7-a604b982eba2@hit.bme.hu> <CAPt1N1=4+Q2VmD=k2PS3y+qk2ZRGeqW45Y+yOm5W+v9G4MQqug@mail.gmail.com> <CAJgLMKv24axzRFGmLmfrS9gqzr4xE1kTu2YWo5oO=H=KO5BPRQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1n4iDuRmSOub475BgcaQfMf_Je-mhaGbaU_VxSR_uMgig@mail.gmail.com> <6222a2d7-685f-872a-2d1d-5c07b2962350@gmail.com> <CAJgLMKs=rCG019Sjaf2tuJhEX6s7Uo_hYjPv_izFNo83zhYrTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sEsq5N-k37rmnfOdQnsMtm0ZtI0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:28:42 -0000

Tim,

> Thanks, at the time I was thinking this was an update to 7084 Routers for supporting prefix delegation on the LAN.  Do we want to continue this document as an RFC, dropping the update or just roll it into 7084?

My take is that if we knew exactly how it would work and there was running code, we should put it into 7084bis.
If we don’t know how to do it, then we should use a separate document.

I’m a little unsure, given the two documents I forwarded to the link earlier.
An interior router would have to dynamically detect upstream / downstream…

Perhaps the best is to work out all the issues in your document, then merge requirements that are ready into 7084bis?

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email