Re: [v6ops] WG Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-04

[Timothy Winters <[e-mail]>]

Draft-05 is available which includes the following updates from IETF-118
and the start of the adoption call.

   - Removed both the hierarchical and flat model requirements from the
   document.
   - Removed update of 7084.
   - By default it suggests giving out a prefix size of 64 to support the
   flat model but allows for setting the prefix higher.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-winters-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd/

So I think I've resolved the existing comments for adoption.  Please let me
know if you have any other concerns about adopting this document.

~Tim

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 2:36 PM Brian E Carpenter <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 15-Nov-23 02:38, Timothy Winters wrote:
> > Hi Ole,
> >
> > I think that's a path forward that can work for me.
>
> +1
>    Brian
>
> >
> > ~Tim
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:28 AM Ole Troan <[e-mail] <mailto:
> [e-mail]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Tim,
> >
> >      > Thanks, at the time I was thinking this was an update to 7084
> Routers for supporting prefix delegation on the LAN.  Do we want to
> continue this document as an RFC, dropping the update or just roll it into
> 7084?
> >
> >     My take is that if we knew exactly how it would work and there was
> running code, we should put it into 7084bis.
> >     If we don’t know how to do it, then we should use a separate
> document.
> >
> >     I’m a little unsure, given the two documents I forwarded to the link
> earlier.
> >     An interior router would have to dynamically detect upstream /
> downstream…
> >
> >     Perhaps the best is to work out all the issues in your document,
> then merge requirements that are ready into 7084bis?
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >     Ole
> >
>