Re: [v6ops] draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00

[Victor Kuarsingh <[e-mail]>]

IPv6 WG,

I would like to kick off some comments on this draft for other group
members to comment.

I do think (Bias noted) that this material is useful for Enterprises who
need to being and/or move their IPv6 deployments.  Many (of those I have
worked with thus far) are bogged down with personnel who are overwhelmed
with what it may take to get IPv6 moving on their networks.

The draft breaks the challenge down by areas of focus (rolled into
"Phases") which can help put this large challenge into bite size chunks
for them. The draft also provides some valid contextual information around
IPv6 and highlights areas which should be looked at.

Given the good momentum we now have in the operator space, it would be
good to see this move forward into the Enterprise space.  I think such
documents can help many of those still waffling (too many to count) to
start acting.

Regards,

Victor K


On 12-03-22 8:02 AM, "Tim Chown" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Due to a typo in the draft name, this draft didn't hit Fred's automated
>WG tools, so the authors would like to raise the draft on the list now
>with a view to securing a slot in Paris to discuss its value and content.
>
>In Taipei there was a comment in the WG session that there is no
>up-to-date v6ops guidance on enterprise networks, while other scenarios
>do have such texts.  So at the mic I invited people to join an effort to
>put something together.  There is a good breadth of experience across the
>people who stepped forward, and the result is available as
>    http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
>
>Does the WG think the subject matter of this draft is one we should
>pursue in the WG?  If so, is the structure and content appropriate?  We
>need some positive feedback and comments in order for Fred to schedule us
>time in Paris.
>
>We have had a couple of people contact us off-list offering to help
>develop the content.  But we'd like some feedback from the WG before
>investing more time in doing so.  The -00 text is somewhat "rough", but
>we feel it could be polished into something quite useful for the
>community.
>
>Tim
>
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops