IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56%

"Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2024 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723F6C14F61E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eg5fsbMA14up for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58380C14F604 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-518e5a74702so540796e87.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713353540; x=1713958340; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=arBeZyL7nLxZmMXLNOVtBQFzyVcbDwz0++vpULZZWVI=; b=Q1slGCmfkqDGBmMuKnAo3O+C+bsiiHO+eOFdjPk12AWV2pwVmjVsIzyneb4rojd5zV 4qd0nZp3lNjGqbWGYarmXwc0WzfTE3u3m/Y+7cXvcrPIwAzxFC3nW6zPJaoPOhxZ8Ovq LY2QlQkup296c0BrgW5PW3biimMUxnGR2rCGcGAPJzhhnt3+9uCQUV6SCo+/UAhgHXPw ux9hUk1bQrhB8YXNV9liHlm72kNs4q/OTWv1RqGszYIqxkl5oPuUFMTe5+2B+ykmOj0H StxL6o0fIWutKD5CJR3UBahJJvuSVvGR5ydfSAxfqDBC1V5iU5yZfwOVts2/9IqLx+Jy sUTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713353540; x=1713958340; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=arBeZyL7nLxZmMXLNOVtBQFzyVcbDwz0++vpULZZWVI=; b=iiDhgSxz5G0zAKtp5iKKFV72oe11RDMxwLFM2//xrp0HWU0OxK/Hcgw83opkgYelaW A0mRDbRrOJYK2/IQbp/sqJMBypDNTbwQ9M/M9DNycSGCjteL6ZwSdk0bF0LPW1mYleHG VkkHxZ8bGgPRy42il5MOUotnOYCsfOR27h8cG6nGsrM4CW4oiB3b5Dupk7SJHaKx9x83 QzbRK4TGd2kt5a4jaHG3YBtLX0Tv7Q/XsyXyXn4LrWilqcuf9MuD/PBx3crDxBz50tap OCPsPNj7ZKMK8KeNWxPOsuFzBhkiid4+OhBmW70DfpNnSMMWyw4yhcXBBNKpZPIkfw2w afPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz1AqSWKmnzCQfLFj7/eQnHaRyzOso82GXIi97CdYp/Z1M5R6pw sRcRXTXh8I5HmFlLBAI2iHjpfIbhg8t3Y8jqYJZO9kSm2gFY4QEagq12Jw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHz+sfoYNw9H2RUy3bYRXvm2a6KIatQ1j8EmvRc97dBbnogdJ6k+FcYACaXP8ae/8oNs8znMg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b07:b0:514:b624:5d36 with SMTP id f7-20020a0565123b0700b00514b6245d36mr1793043lfv.32.1713353540273; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2804:431:cfcd:6eab::536f:6e69? ([2804:431:cfcd:6eab::536f:6e69]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q12-20020ac2510c000000b00513d3b5d4f5sm1947349lfb.128.2024.04.17.04.32.18 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 04:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: "Soni L." <fakedme@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b42d94a8-1c5a-472e-bcc8-0a398ff1fb37@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:32:14 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <ZfplwNJGdpl05bZO@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <EF78559D-7879-4C0D-A47B-08AB279FD40B@isc.org> <5a4d382100604730bd31c45ba196d62a@huawei.com> <41e6d96d-dd6d-4982-9160-92bffb5eafad@nsrc.org> <Zh-trcwsxAwHgkus@Space.Net>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Zh-trcwsxAwHgkus@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wfnQ-o62QASj17TOYXNUwA07q8o>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56%
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:32:24 -0000


On 2024-04-17 08:08, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:53:35AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> > Also, everyone should be clear that there is currently no such thing as
> > "migrate to IPv6". You either add IPv6 to your IPv4 stack, or you stay with
> > IPv4. You can't remove the IPv4 part without cutting yourself off from most
> > of the Internet.
>
> This is not a message the IETF should be spreading, because then the logical
> question follows "why bother with IPv6 at all, if I have to keep IP4 around".
>
> And indeed, dual-stack is worse than IPv4 only.  Says me, who has had
> dual-stack v4+v6 in our network and on our web server since 1999 or so.

also, you can* remove the ipv4 stack. at least, from the kernel.

personally we maintain that getting end nodes to migrate to "ipv6-only" 
is the way to go, even -- especially -- in ipv4(-only) networks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email