[v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56%
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 20 March 2024 04:27 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6A6C14CEFE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8FtdSrxZCoF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83AD3C14F69E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzwYX6RgNznkPh; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4TzwYX5d8Tzkn8p; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:27:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:27:44 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: v6ops@ietf.org, gih@apnic.net
Message-ID: <ZfplwNJGdpl05bZO@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SnhT0wDpKXAL8d0QxpHO5HfaABk>
Subject: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56%
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:27:54 -0000
Has anyone tried to at least to try to determine the causes of the 56% fragmentation failures ?
Aka: do we know that there are not single relevant causes that actually could be addressed ?
I fail to belive upfront that there are 10,000 individual issues, none happening in more than 0.0056% of the
instances.
Cheers
Toerless
- [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Nalini J Elkins
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Xipengxiao
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Soni "They/Them" L.
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Brian Candler
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
- Re: [v6ops] Geoff/queue-closed: 56% Xipengxiao