IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 20 March 2024 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84629C151542 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b="ZbvxkMJz"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b="GofrpKLp"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJ3RJIlL6r-4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.2.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CDAC14F69A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (zimbrang.isc.org [149.20.2.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0803AB1BF; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 mx.pao1.isc.org 9C0803AB1BF
Authentication-Results: mx.pao1.isc.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=149.20.2.31
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1710899922; cv=none; b=RxRRo444waG6j3Kn0HfRbHx1NkTBZSyZsxLwHL2B+OoBhqB9zTiyzHmImQgDHGCAeV7oSi80Jm+XpbrcMpYlOc8TbclIo7V2xovrSz/q1v8vTA5nlejIBMdJkOizTdMRmBg0OQ7oU8tMU3BhcmchWmdi1i5h43KKBGKWXn5Zv4Y=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1710899922; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=iJjV/3QcVzl0vxtb2OrAYwU9blQZTKRsbh+5kmJfEDo=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date: Message-Id:To; b=V7b7+wMv+Xe8gWs0JStzST5D+eufDEtd9dtTrObH2LgofyzcPfC0ZlV6TVtERM06v77CuDoRzijsMoZwlp8Ly2r9D1NSn6lyvn1Cih8v3/kE33otpW3SPf6rpPwWGCc/9z45bIcDIeqOjKBKtBqFpygvwWXWk/4MlNPlFnUXIPE=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.pao1.isc.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mx.pao1.isc.org 9C0803AB1BF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1710899922; bh=yqBbbMI/PZYeYwK3bZ0Te+LqRjxL/owGruu5FUrLn24=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=ZbvxkMJzRHVDXWqB8pxv5XqzI4A0fOYz7qOY+zK97n3tygeuUSaZxLPONykddcRoU qbwK6rn0M2RLh2E6mhY1bXUtIyCQiO/d1y2R6HJnB9mt2lgRoSXeryHwrEGHyc2gUC GvLDz+oqKDjpi2LsQFi6SSbX5TdUXM+UKCL2e1Lc=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D48F6ADC8; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3AF6B03F; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbrang.isc.org 76E3AF6B03F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1710899922; bh=iJjV/3QcVzl0vxtb2OrAYwU9blQZTKRsbh+5kmJfEDo=; h=From:Mime-Version:Date:Message-Id:To; b=GofrpKLplc71y4Le54vcoW/Ul5IGohYVlWsM6uBXPfsLHK4aDqNJ4sEqNuH8bjuMu 8wwfCCqOcZhYuUMhFYlGPxsYoIDCHom6ApZs5ixLcoG1oNF7/O7VAGr8zOBFRkkIuH Md+stESSxUnw9hxhc8GYS8DAWcr4wM95rzRMb3L4=
Received: from zimbrang.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbrang.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id CwP7HymObE1K; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (n49-187-18-238.bla1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.187.18.238]) by zimbrang.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BB96F6ADC8; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-C593D089-EC38-4A47-8ACB-B3ED203D58D5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:58:37 +1100
Message-Id: <DDC693C6-632D-4B62-A812-906158DBE23C@isc.org>
References: <CAKD1Yr3V7h-=CUP-m8fLwN7DSyMixmRyNixer++hAN61iwN1cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3V7h-=CUP-m8fLwN7DSyMixmRyNixer++hAN61iwN1cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19H380)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/e_yjI1VaSHr0kvdfTTl4RJhzXAk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:58:47 -0000

Well people do use DS-Lite. Why should the be treated as second class citizens.

-- 
Mark Andrews

> On 20 Mar 2024, at 12:33, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> We could define this, but would it be useful? 464xlat is very widely implemented - pretty much all host OSes either support it or plan to. but I don't think any substantial number of hosts supports DS-Lite.
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:17 AM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>> DHCPv4 option 108 is tied to 464XLAT.  DS-Lite is already has per host support defined.  DS-Lite only needs an equivalent DHCPv4 option that specifies DS-Lite is supported by the node rather than 464XLAT as is indicated by 108.
>> -- 
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email