IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4583C1654FE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vhu7e430DS0o for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7EBC15792A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-568d323e7fbso4002882a12.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1710898411; x=1711503211; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MEh+CFlkdqt6u2mfp+Pykncxae2gGT9nLmXbtKg7Y8k=; b=fE3AcSztwqMrLFoMAIySb/Rs9t4MsmqF6IunlY23Kue0OxgH1DtkhqYKdpq6W+rrUA Kv/H7yaMhxhch01rRyb9hYIUF0vMb9b8SmucvdqcWAWyOkR6ozw0PYCoJ2NJQHY8IeoY DYqNlRjngVj0qNEuR9wJ+JwOlc1EwaizbLM1231o2pQiD6TassvqR76igz4EHWTiUSg2 /CaV3wHlVTszTCuWjT1WYItemKMTE1UlvTjBwQVdviZ4BMASiXVyX1Ruy9Gd3HmkCSDx FnwQydsXBAN/QvHvUeAbHhKniiWfxX8Y8uOwth1xC4XLO4Wpq29NjGeKPnBi6sxrk8sK i7jw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710898411; x=1711503211; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MEh+CFlkdqt6u2mfp+Pykncxae2gGT9nLmXbtKg7Y8k=; b=RIslQfMUbYH2NUZIHeGYq5/x50wSHwSV0XnKqAMb57/pSOpQee4xBhwA3oHnE0so9W avI8SK0rJJ46Jw6iTnc67P+PVqjrIeYn+b2D/px0PT9j+mW6rAqx5fHzy4VsxL2KIZEc jdBBrHdE6RF7DNrzmekfSuo4BhqrkkZhmvd6t7kch2tiSxtVgkK0TyTXneJo14PoTpPn BagCrIbA2/tJwxB1wuejzpVyeiq1l2JubuO/lUzwq0aPg2f3VMZnLdwhZEQbbNZKtP2/ 1P3Di3W1o8IL8c9vokF965U7+THY0QMdPeEhmpkKlmMLa5Z53Ax83sAbMg/eFzOYyVpA a19A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5uSxS6ctszI8oujvFyCkO8iixmd28peCkS4gGz7/c5dnQo51I rd55kZASMbod49AWBLCwVUNZQOF9iT1n0ATxInAvaM2+pWlfxkg022H0iOyqjoG5BzSt7CQuS4r uG0U4QZcP7vfueQmg2uL0uVXA4XErtkXcwlMG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF3C5p4JTeMtPGoEZNCU+sig2hPJJb8d6ol5p8cUObWJhZ04R9mBme2/0t8Qe6CMExG20/W1wxt6kriAyBVUCc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:11db:b0:a46:6808:2cee with SMTP id o27-20020a17090611db00b00a4668082ceemr11261787eja.66.1710898411154; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <453A0844-6811-4F6C-BD93-B314B694AF87@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <453A0844-6811-4F6C-BD93-B314B694AF87@isc.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:33:19 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3V7h-=CUP-m8fLwN7DSyMixmRyNixer++hAN61iwN1cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b8df806140d94eb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JutjPQ64eM3lqXsD55C-8JCJnKU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:33:36 -0000

We could define this, but would it be useful? 464xlat is very widely
implemented - pretty much all host OSes either support it or plan to. but I
don't think any substantial number of hosts supports DS-Lite.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:17 AM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> DHCPv4 option 108 is tied to 464XLAT.  DS-Lite is already has per host
> support defined.  DS-Lite only needs an equivalent DHCPv4 option that
> specifies DS-Lite is supported by the node rather than 464XLAT as is
> indicated by 108.
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 <+61%202%209871%204742>              INTERNET:
> marka@isc.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email